2013
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2012.2186104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Elliptic Curve Point Multiplication Using Digit-Serial Binary Field Operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
114
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Virtex5, the best reported performance result over GF (2 163 ) is 5.48 µs and is presented in [13] with 6150 slices. Our proposed ECC processor consumes only 4393 slices to compute a point multiplication in 4.91 µs is better in both speed (10%) and area (29%) than that in [13].…”
Section: Implementation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For Virtex5, the best reported performance result over GF (2 163 ) is 5.48 µs and is presented in [13] with 6150 slices. Our proposed ECC processor consumes only 4393 slices to compute a point multiplication in 4.91 µs is better in both speed (10%) and area (29%) than that in [13].…”
Section: Implementation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the field squaring and field addition operations can be operated concurrently with multiplication then the point operations latency will be equivalent to the latency of the six field multiplications. The six multiplications can, for example, be computed in two steps using three multipliers or in three steps using two multipliers or in six steps by serial multiplications using one multiplier [17], [13] and [10]. Again, the digit size can affect the performance of ECC; for example, a bit serial implementation takes m cycles, a digit ( bits) serial one takes ( / ) cycles and a bit parallel implementation takes a single clock cycle [8], [12] and [11].…”
Section: A Point Multiplication Without Pipelining Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 3 gives a comparison results with the state-of-the-art implementations. As it is shown in the table below, the implementation in [26] presents a minimal area compared to the proposed ECC architecture while requiring an important execution time at the same time. Thus, the implementation results of the proposed ECC architecture outperform those of the implementation in [28] in terms of area and required time to compute the scalar multiplication.…”
Section: Simulation and Synthesis Results Of Ecc Ipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hardware-based implementations of such algorithms have proved to be more efficient than equivalent software's programs in terms of speed and resources usage. This is mainly due to exploring new design architectures [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Such designs are generally written in hardware description languages (HDLs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%