2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient estimation of conditionally linear and Gaussian state space models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a model would in particular be challenging for methods based on the Laplace approximation such as INLA (Rue et al, 2009), and recently, specialised computational methods for such models have been developed (see e.g. Moura and Turatti, 2014;Shephard, 2015;Li and Koopman, 2018). Here, on the other hand, it is shown that with a very modest coding effort under the proposed methodology, this model is easily tackled using the general purpose Stan software.…”
Section: Realistic Application -The Stock and Watson (2007) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a model would in particular be challenging for methods based on the Laplace approximation such as INLA (Rue et al, 2009), and recently, specialised computational methods for such models have been developed (see e.g. Moura and Turatti, 2014;Shephard, 2015;Li and Koopman, 2018). Here, on the other hand, it is shown that with a very modest coding effort under the proposed methodology, this model is easily tackled using the general purpose Stan software.…”
Section: Realistic Application -The Stock and Watson (2007) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which assumes that the future oil price consists of components with a direct interpretation that cannot be observed. ese three models are commonly used and proved that they can generate relatively accurate linear regression prediction [18,[34][35][36][37][42][43][44][45]. Same as the full model (equation (1)), these three restricted model versions can also do hierarchical parameter shrinkage and decide which variable parameter varies with time.…”
Section: Empirical Models and Computation Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their analysis, Stock and Watson (2007) fix the parameters ω 2 h = ω 2 g = 0.2. In a recent study, Moura and Turatti (2014) estimate the two parameters while maintaining the assumption that ω 2 h = ω 2 g = ω 2 . Using inflation in the G7 countries, they find that the estimates of ω 2 are statistically different from the calibrated value of 0.2 for a few countries.…”
Section: Application 1: Time-varying Volatility In Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%