2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/9982397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Estimation of the Generalized Quasi-Lindley Distribution Parameters under Ranked Set Sampling and Applications

Abstract: Ranked set sampling is a very useful method to collect data when the actual measurement of the units in a population is difficult or expensive. Recently, the generalized quasi-Lindley distribution is suggested as a new continuous lifetime distribution. In this article, the ranked set sampling method is considered to estimate the parameters of the generalized quasi-Lindley distribution. Several estimation methods are used, including the maximum likelihood, the maximum product of spacings, ordinary least squares… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Ss = sample size, Z = z-value representing the data's confidence level, P(1 − p) = response variance, and Me = margin of error or sampling error. The margin of error for this survey study was 10%, the Z-score was 1.96 (for a two-tailed alternate hypothesis at α = 0.05), and the sample proportion was 50% for simple random sampling [87,88]. Therefore, the minimum sample size required to examine the risk factors associated with the use of ImTs was 97 respondents.…”
Section: Survey Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Ss = sample size, Z = z-value representing the data's confidence level, P(1 − p) = response variance, and Me = margin of error or sampling error. The margin of error for this survey study was 10%, the Z-score was 1.96 (for a two-tailed alternate hypothesis at α = 0.05), and the sample proportion was 50% for simple random sampling [87,88]. Therefore, the minimum sample size required to examine the risk factors associated with the use of ImTs was 97 respondents.…”
Section: Survey Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[53] for the Birnbaum-Saunders distribution, Ref. [54] for the generalized quasi-Lindley distribution, Ref. [55] for the Weibull distribution, and Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%