1972
DOI: 10.1147/rd.161.0045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Evaluation of Array Subscripts of Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the original APL group was working on the design and development of APLSV in Philadelphia, a rather different line of inquiry was going on in IBM's Palo Alto Scientific Center in California. It introduced the use of arithmetic progression vectors (APv), which conserved both time and storage in many common situations, and facilitated more efficient evaluation of certain array transformations; 20 it made use of a very fast syntax analyzer that required a new internal representation of APL statements; and it used a different storage allocation method. As shown in the first column of Figure 1, this work first resulted in a microcoded APL system for the System/360 Model 25.…”
Section: Falkoffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the original APL group was working on the design and development of APLSV in Philadelphia, a rather different line of inquiry was going on in IBM's Palo Alto Scientific Center in California. It introduced the use of arithmetic progression vectors (APv), which conserved both time and storage in many common situations, and facilitated more efficient evaluation of certain array transformations; 20 it made use of a very fast syntax analyzer that required a new internal representation of APL statements; and it used a different storage allocation method. As shown in the first column of Figure 1, this work first resulted in a microcoded APL system for the System/360 Model 25.…”
Section: Falkoffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, APL never had an associated indexing calculus like the ψ-calculus. Similarly, closure was not obtained for Abrams' indexing rules despite 10+ years of research [73,74,75,76,77].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%