Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2396761.2398468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient extraction of ontologies from domain specific text corpora

Abstract: There is a huge body of domain-specific knowledge embedded in free-text repositories such as engineering documents, instruction manuals, medical references and legal files.Extracting ontological relationships (e.g., ISA and HASA) from this kind of I also want to thank the NSERC BIN funding for supporting me on this ontology extraction research project, it gives a great opportunity to learn more about my research area and sharpen my technical skills.Finally, I would like thank my mom, who always supports me fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We want to create large, open domain knowledgebases or taxonomies, whose scale or coverage is especially important to the applications built on top of them. Because manually constructed taxonomies cannot reach sufficient scale and coverage, much recent work [13,4,17,16,20] uses data driven approaches to automatically acquire taxonomies from a large corpus such as the World Wide Web. Take Probase [1,20] as an example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We want to create large, open domain knowledgebases or taxonomies, whose scale or coverage is especially important to the applications built on top of them. Because manually constructed taxonomies cannot reach sufficient scale and coverage, much recent work [13,4,17,16,20] uses data driven approaches to automatically acquire taxonomies from a large corpus such as the World Wide Web. Take Probase [1,20] as an example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%