2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-018-6040-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient facial expression recognition using histogram of oriented gradients in wavelet domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ghimire et al divided the whole face region into domain-specific local regions; then region-specific appearance features and geometric features are extracted from the domain-specific regions for facial expression recognition [ 22 ]. Nigam et al retrieved Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) feature in DWT domain and an SVM was used for expression recognition [ 23 ]. Kamarol et al proposed spatiotemporal texture map (STTM) to capture subtle spatial and temporal variations of facial expressions with low computational complexity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghimire et al divided the whole face region into domain-specific local regions; then region-specific appearance features and geometric features are extracted from the domain-specific regions for facial expression recognition [ 22 ]. Nigam et al retrieved Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) feature in DWT domain and an SVM was used for expression recognition [ 23 ]. Kamarol et al proposed spatiotemporal texture map (STTM) to capture subtle spatial and temporal variations of facial expressions with low computational complexity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [35] fused HOG features with Weber local descriptor and classified facial expressions using chi-square distance with nearest neighbour technique. Nigam et al [36] computed HOG features in discrete wavelet domain for effective characterization of facial expressions. Zeng et al [37] presented a novel deep architecture wherein they extracted from emotional images HOG features and concatenated them with local binary pattern and grey levels and learnt the discriminative high dimensional features using sparse auto-encoders.…”
Section: Hog and Facial Expression Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly, researchers try to construct some intermediate features to represent different view characters of same image or object, classical methods commonly used by them include the structured and repetitive visual unit, key points and local descriptors, etc [7]- [9]. Such as local binary patterns (LBP) [10], local extrema patterns (LEP) [11], histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) [12], multi-trend structure descriptor (MTSD) [13], pyramid histogram of oriented gradients (PHOG) [14], scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) [15] and Gist [16]. Most of these methods try to extract multiple views features of image for retrieval and classification to increase the system's final accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%