2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.101.102003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient gravitational-wave glitch identification from environmental data through machine learning

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Sec. 3 we compare the fixed-feature, logistic regression-based model of [16] (which we refer to as FF) to an equivalent linear model with features learned from raw data (which we refer to as LF) and find significant improvement. In Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Sec. 3 we compare the fixed-feature, logistic regression-based model of [16] (which we refer to as FF) to an equivalent linear model with features learned from raw data (which we refer to as LF) and find significant improvement. In Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This would be especially beneficial for searches that require low latency, such as the early warning of binary neutron star mergers (Baltus et al, 2021 ; Yu et al, 2021 ). Other successful usage of ML techniques in GW astronomy include the identification of various GW events (Bayley et al, 2020 ; Chan et al, 2020 ; Dreissigacker and Prix, 2020 ; Huerta et al, 2020 ; Krastev, 2020 ; Schäfer et al, 2020 ; Wong et al, 2020 ; Beheshtipour and Papa, 2021 ; Chang et al, 2021 ; Chatterjee et al, 2021 ; López et al, 2021 ; Marianer et al, 2021 ; Mishra et al, 2021 ; Saiz-Pérez et al, 2021 ; Wei and Huerta, 2021 ; Yan et al, 2021 ), source parameter estimations (Gabbard et al, 2019 ; Chatterjee et al, 2020 ; Chua and Vallisneri, 2020 ; Green et al, 2020 ; Talbot and Thrane, 2020 ; Álvares et al, 2021 ; D'Emilio et al, 2021 ; Krastev et al, 2021 ; Williams et al, 2021 ; Xia et al, 2021 ), and detector characterization (Biswas et al, 2020 ; Colgan et al, 2020 ; Cuoco et al, 2020 ; Essick et al, 2020 ; Torres-Forné et al, 2020 ; Mogushi, 2021 ; Sankarapandian and Kulis, 2021 ; Soni et al, 2021 ; Zhan et al, 2021 ). Besides GW astronomy, the usage of CNNs has led to breakthroughs in a variety of topics related to time-series forecasting and classification (e.g., Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the use of Deep Neural Networks (DNN) for classification and/or prediction tasks has become the standard on data analysis applications, ranging from medical diagnosis [10] to particle physics [11]. This trend has now organically been extended to GW astronomy, both for signal detection [12] and for detector characterization, by reducing the impact of noise artifacts or "glitches" of instrumental and environmental origin [13], [14]. Recent approaches to eliminate, or at least mitigate, the effect of glitches are discussed in [15], [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%