2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3975(99)00020-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient implementation of regular languages using reversed alternating finite automata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An r-AFA [Chandra et al 1981;Salomaa et al 2000] consists of (Q, Σ, δ, I , F ) where the transition function δ assigns to each state in Q a Boolean combination of the previous values of Q. For example, we could assign δ (q 3 ) = q 1 ∧ (q 2 ∨ ¬q 3 ).…”
Section: Comparison With Finite-state Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An r-AFA [Chandra et al 1981;Salomaa et al 2000] consists of (Q, Σ, δ, I , F ) where the transition function δ assigns to each state in Q a Boolean combination of the previous values of Q. For example, we could assign δ (q 3 ) = q 1 ∧ (q 2 ∨ ¬q 3 ).…”
Section: Comparison With Finite-state Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independently, AFA were introduced in [3,4] under the name of Boolean automata. Since then most of the subsequent research focused on various types of alternating machines to complexity classes, see for example, [5,6,8,9,10,12,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%