2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.11.150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient iris localization and recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…we use a statistical method to account eyelashes presented in litirature [12] and 1D Log-Gabor Filter features to uniquely identify iris. We have studied various well known algorithms for iris recognition [29], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37] and compared the results with state-of-the art algorithms. Fig.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…we use a statistical method to account eyelashes presented in litirature [12] and 1D Log-Gabor Filter features to uniquely identify iris. We have studied various well known algorithms for iris recognition [29], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37] and compared the results with state-of-the art algorithms. Fig.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rai et al [35] used Support Vector Machine (SVM), Hamming Distance, parabola detection and trimmed median filter to detect and remove the eyelid, and eyelashes from the iris image. Soliman et al [36] used a coarse-to-fine algorithm to address the computational cost problem and the integrodifferential operator to get information aboutpupil centers and radii. In [37] Dehkordi et al used Adaptive Hamming Distance to improve the performance of iris code matching stage.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the characterization of the iris, the most useful methods are the Gabor wavelet transform applied by Daugman, the Gabor filter [24], the Laplacian pyramid [25], and orientable pyramid transform method [26]. We have studied various well-known algorithms for iris recognition [17,18,27,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and propose a new method for iris detection based on the fusion of FLDA/PCA. We also employ 1D Log-Gabor filter and used hamming distance for comparison between two iris templates.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a refinement step is performed using an integrodifferential operator to obtain the centers and the final rays of the iris and the pupil. This system is robust against occlusions and intensity variations [65]. Naseem et al (2017) proposed an algorithm to compare the vanguard spatial representation classification with Bayesian fusion for several sectors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed two algorithms: First, a new method to eliminate the noise of the iris image and, second, a method to extract the characteristics of the texture through a combined approach of the local binary model and the gray level cooccurrence matrix. The proposed approach provided the highest recognition rate of 96.5% and low error rate and required less uptime[64] Soliman et al (2017). introduced a rough algorithm to solve the computational cost problem while achieving an acceptable precision.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%