2012
DOI: 10.1093/restud/rds040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Likelihood Evaluation of State-Space Representations

Abstract: We develop a numerical procedure that facilitates e¢ cient likelihood evaluation in applications involving non-linear and non-Gaussian state-space models. The procedure approximates necessary integrals using continuous approximations of target densities. Construction is achieved via e¢ cient importance sampling, and approximating densities are adapted to fully incorporate current information. We illustrate our procedure in applications to dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method requires O(N (T + 1) log N ) operations due to the sorting of the particles, but the resulting continuous estimate of ℓ T (θ) can be maximized using standard optimization techniques. Extensions to the multivariate case where X ⊆ R nx (with n x > 1) have been proposed in [59] and [22]. However, the scheme [59] does not guarantee continuity of the likelihood function estimate and only provides log-likelihood estimates which are positively correlated for neighboring values in the parameter space, whereas the scheme in [22] has O(N 2 ) computational complexity and relies on a nonstandard particle filtering scheme.…”
Section: Likelihood Function Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method requires O(N (T + 1) log N ) operations due to the sorting of the particles, but the resulting continuous estimate of ℓ T (θ) can be maximized using standard optimization techniques. Extensions to the multivariate case where X ⊆ R nx (with n x > 1) have been proposed in [59] and [22]. However, the scheme [59] does not guarantee continuity of the likelihood function estimate and only provides log-likelihood estimates which are positively correlated for neighboring values in the parameter space, whereas the scheme in [22] has O(N 2 ) computational complexity and relies on a nonstandard particle filtering scheme.…”
Section: Likelihood Function Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a renewed interest in the use of particle filters for computing marginal likelihood (integrating over state variables) for the purpose of parameter estimation has emerged (Fernandez-Villaverde and Rubio-Ramirez, 2007;Andrieu et al, 2010;Kantas et al, 2009;Malik and Pitt, 2011;DeJong et al, 2013). This is also the context of the present paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Recently, a renewed interest in the use of particle filters for computing marginal likelihood (integrating over state variables) for the purpose of parameter estimation has emerged (FernandezVillaverde and Rubio-Ramirez, 2007;Andrieu et al, 2010;Kantas et al, 2009;Malik and Pitt, 2011;DeJong et al, 2013). This is also the context of the present paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A renewed interest in particle filters in the econometric literature have at least partly been driven by the aim of estimating non-linear solutions to dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models (Fernandez-Villaverde and Rubio-Ramirez, 2007;Amisano and Tristani, 2010;Andreasen, 2011;DeJong et al, 2013;Flury and Shephard, 2011;Malik and Pitt, 2011). We consider a simple neoclassical growth DSGE model (King et al, 1988;Schmitt-Grohe and Uribe, 2004), with equilibrium condition given as…”
Section: Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%