2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17274-8_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Marker Matching Using Pair-Wise Constraints in Physical Therapy

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we report a robust, efficient, and automatic method for matching infrared tracked markers for human motion analysis in computer-aided physical therapy applications. The challenges of this task stem from non-rigid marker motion, occlusion, and timing requirements. To overcome these difficulties, we use pair-wise distance constraints for marker identification. To meet the timing requirements, we first reduce the candidate marker labels by proximity constraints before enforcing the pair-w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[27][28][29][30][31][32] The motion estimation problem recovers the 3D motion parameters (rotation and translation) of a moving object from images taken at two time instances. Since finding exact point correspondence (typically using local structural comparison) is considerably time-consuming due to the large number of points involved 27,29 and challenging due to the presence of missing points, 30,33 motion parameters are usually estimated without knowing correspondences. 25,28,32 Fortunately, the number of markers used in our problem is usually rather small (<10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[27][28][29][30][31][32] The motion estimation problem recovers the 3D motion parameters (rotation and translation) of a moving object from images taken at two time instances. Since finding exact point correspondence (typically using local structural comparison) is considerably time-consuming due to the large number of points involved 27,29 and challenging due to the presence of missing points, 30,33 motion parameters are usually estimated without knowing correspondences. 25,28,32 Fortunately, the number of markers used in our problem is usually rather small (<10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constraints are based on PWDs, the invariance of which is assumed under rigid motion. 33 The backtracking approach is the standard way to solve a CSP. 23 It traverses the space of partial solutions in a depth first manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%