2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2015.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient multi-atlas abdominal segmentation on clinically acquired CT with SIMPLE context learning

Abstract: Abdominal segmentation on clinically acquired computed tomography (CT) has been a challenging problem given the inter-subject variance of human abdomens and complex 3-D relationships among organs. Multi-atlas segmentation (MAS) provides a potentially robust solution by leveraging label atlases via image registration and statistical fusion. We posit that the efficiency of atlas selection requires further exploration in the context of substantial registration errors. The selective and iterative method for perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, manual delineation is typically tedious and time consuming. To alleviate the required manual efforts, previous techniques have been made to perform automatic abdominal organ segmentations for computed tomography (CT) [26] and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [7–10]. However, segmenting these organs presents unique challenges in that the shape, size, location, and orientation of abdominal organs vary greatly from person to person and even from time to time in the same person (as illustrated in Figure 1) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, manual delineation is typically tedious and time consuming. To alleviate the required manual efforts, previous techniques have been made to perform automatic abdominal organ segmentations for computed tomography (CT) [26] and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [7–10]. However, segmenting these organs presents unique challenges in that the shape, size, location, and orientation of abdominal organs vary greatly from person to person and even from time to time in the same person (as illustrated in Figure 1) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the appearance of those organs depends greatly on the quality of the image, which differs for each scanner. Traditionally, multi-atlas methods have been able to segment abdominal organs with reasonable accuracy [1, 5, 6, 10, 11]. More recently, researchers have demonstrated that fully convolutional neural networks (FCNN) show great promise in both general image segmentation and abdominal organ segmentation of CT scans [1, 12, 13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, several authors extended their individual structure methods to multi-structures. Some examples are the atlasbased (Okada et al, 2015;Wolz et al, 2013;Xu et al, 2015), and statistical-based approaches (Yan et al, 2005;Yang et al, 2004). Despite the high versatility obtained, overlapping and merged regions were typically found, requiring post-processing techniques through mathematical morphology operations or refinement methodologies (Iglesias and Sabuncu, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, another variant of multiatlas segmentation of abdominal organs was used in a recent paper by Xu et al [36]. Atlas selection and label fusion were done using a reformulation of the selective and iterative method for performance-level estimation (SIMPLE) method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%