2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00778-015-0412-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient order dependency detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This complexity is similar to previous FD and inclusion dependency discovery algorithms such as TANE [10]. In one of our experimental runs, using a flight dataset with 1000 tuples and 20 attributes, our algorithm takes under one second whereas the algorithm from [13] does not terminate after five hours (Section 5).…”
Section: Problem Statement and Contributionssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This complexity is similar to previous FD and inclusion dependency discovery algorithms such as TANE [10]. In one of our experimental runs, using a flight dataset with 1000 tuples and 20 attributes, our algorithm takes under one second whereas the algorithm from [13] does not terminate after five hours (Section 5).…”
Section: Problem Statement and Contributionssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Our pruning rules do not affect the completeness of the discovered ODs. The list-based algorithm in [13] uses aggressive pruning rules to overcome their factorial complexity, which we show leads to incompleteness (counter to the claim of complete discovery made in [13]). They can miss important ODs.…”
Section: Problem Statement and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations