2005
DOI: 10.1049/el:20052597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient pipeline FFT processors for WLAN MIMO-OFDM systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, MDC pipeline method which is consisted of multi-I/O paths and parallel architecture has the increased throughput in proportion to the number of multi-I/O paths in MIMO-OFDM systems. Therefore, MDC pipeline method is suitable method for MIMO-OFDM systems and the architectures based on MDC pipeline method are recently proposed such as R2MDC, R4MDC, R8MDC and mixed-radix MDC (MRMDC) [2,3].…”
Section: Conventional Fft Processor For Mimo-ofdm Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, MDC pipeline method which is consisted of multi-I/O paths and parallel architecture has the increased throughput in proportion to the number of multi-I/O paths in MIMO-OFDM systems. Therefore, MDC pipeline method is suitable method for MIMO-OFDM systems and the architectures based on MDC pipeline method are recently proposed such as R2MDC, R4MDC, R8MDC and mixed-radix MDC (MRMDC) [2,3].…”
Section: Conventional Fft Processor For Mimo-ofdm Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 (a) shows the required area comparison of the proposed method and the conventional methods at 1 × 1 channel to 8 × 8 channels. The area of a complex multiplier converts to 50 adders for the equivalent comparison of conventional methods if a 16-bit precision and the scheme of three real multiplier and five real adders is considered in its implementation [3]. To obtain the variable comparison, we add the R2MDC to the methods of Table I.…”
Section: Proposed Multi-input R2 Sdf-kr For Mimo-ofdm Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several different architectures have been proposed, based on different decomposition methods, such as the Radix-2 Multipath Delay Commutator (R2MDC) [1], Radix-2 Single-Path Delay Feedback (R2SDF) [2], Radix-4 Single-Path Delay Commutator (R4SDC) [3], and Radix-2 2 Single-Path Delay Feedback (R2 2 SDF) [4]. More recently, Radix-2 2 to Radix-2 4 SDF FFTs were studied and compared in [5]; in [6] an R2 3 SDF was implemented and shown to be area efficient for 2 or 3 multipath channels. Each of these architectures can be classified as multipath or single-path.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monoprocessor architectures such as [5] have to be discarded, as they are not able to fulfill the timing specifications. The throughput can be increased by using either parallel [6,7] or pipeline architectures [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Pipeline architectures present smaller latency and lower-power consumption [8,9], which makes them suitable for mobile devices such as DVB-T/DVB-H receivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%