2017
DOI: 10.2514/1.j055237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Aeroengine Turbine Disks Using Probability Density Evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneously, the probability failure risk is calculated by combining the crack growth rate equation and stress intensity factor equation. In this study, via an integral-based method called the fast NI method [27,36], the probability of disk failure is computed while taking multiple variables into consideration, e.g., the initial defect size, the load, the crack growth velocity, and the fracture toughness. Since the research method in this study connects the manufacturing plan directly with the engineering plan, the analysis of random variables can be ignored here.…”
Section: Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, the probability failure risk is calculated by combining the crack growth rate equation and stress intensity factor equation. In this study, via an integral-based method called the fast NI method [27,36], the probability of disk failure is computed while taking multiple variables into consideration, e.g., the initial defect size, the load, the crack growth velocity, and the fracture toughness. Since the research method in this study connects the manufacturing plan directly with the engineering plan, the analysis of random variables can be ignored here.…”
Section: Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial unbalance will bring an additional force and torque, which may lead to the rotor vibration and even cause the nonlinear vibration accident (Cui et al, 2017). For aircraft engine and gas turbines, the response levels caused by the initial unbalance of final assembly out of specification limits, under dynamic loading, can be 100 or 1,000 times greater than the levels resulting from static loading of the same magnitude (Ewins, 2010;Wang et al, 2017;Yang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 For aero-engine and gas turbines, the response levels caused by the amount of unbalance of final assembly out of specification limits, under dynamic loading, can be 100 or 1000 times greater than the levels resulting from static loading of the same magnitude. 5,6…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%