2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-12586-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient removal of nitrogen and phosphorus in aqueous solutions using modified water treatment residuals–sodium alginate beads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is obvious that higher dosage leads to lower adsorption capacity; hence, in consideration of the removal rate and adsorption capacity, the dosage of 1 g/L is chosen in following experiments. [35]. At initial concentration of 20, 50, and 100 mg/L, the equilibrium MO concentration decreased to 11.0, 23.0, and 41.5 mg/L.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is obvious that higher dosage leads to lower adsorption capacity; hence, in consideration of the removal rate and adsorption capacity, the dosage of 1 g/L is chosen in following experiments. [35]. At initial concentration of 20, 50, and 100 mg/L, the equilibrium MO concentration decreased to 11.0, 23.0, and 41.5 mg/L.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Time-dependent adsorption experiments were carried out with different initial dye concentrations (20, 50, and 100 mg/L). As shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(d), the remaining concentrations of MO and CR are recorded at different time intervals in 36 h. Obviously, the adsorption reactions show rapid adsorption rates at initial stage and stabilized afterwards [35]. At initial concentration of 20, 50, and 100 mg/L, the equilibrium MO concentration decreased to 11.0, 23.0, and 41.5 mg/L.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These modifications result in favorable characteristics such as enhanced specific surface area and easy regeneration capacity. These modified WTRs have been used for the removal of a variety of pollutants such as fluoride [ 34 ], nitrogen and phosphorus [ 35 ], turbidity [ 19 ], molybdenum (VI) [ 20 ], chromium [ 36 ] and dyes [ 26 , 31 , 37 ], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the chemical precipitation method can easily cause secondary pollution [19], while the biological treatment technique requires a long reaction period with stringent conditions [20]. In comparison, adsorption is a relatively convenient and reliable technique, but it normally has a long treatment cycle and low efficiency, and if one wants to use an efficient adsorbent for the adsorption, the cost is usually high [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%