Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2021
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Sampling of Dependency Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this trick the total worst-case complexity is O(n 3 ). Zmigrod et al (2021b) showed that even though Colbourn's algorithm was originally designed for unconstrained spanning trees it can easily be extended to sampling dependency trees by just using the version of Matrix-Tree Theorem by Koo et al (2007). The details of this version of MTT are presented in the Appendix A.…”
Section: Wilson Samplermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…With this trick the total worst-case complexity is O(n 3 ). Zmigrod et al (2021b) showed that even though Colbourn's algorithm was originally designed for unconstrained spanning trees it can easily be extended to sampling dependency trees by just using the version of Matrix-Tree Theorem by Koo et al (2007). The details of this version of MTT are presented in the Appendix A.…”
Section: Wilson Samplermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sample an edge e from the set of all edges that are coming out of ROOT by using their This extension is very simple, but unfortunately, as we show here, it is biased. The proof of unbiasedness present in Zmigrod et al (2021b) is incorrect because it ignores the normalization constant. This is an error because the normalization constant for G and G is not the same and therefore should influence the rest of sampling.…”
Section: Wilsonrc Extension Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations