2012
DOI: 10.4304/jnw.7.3.517-523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Satellite Scheduling Based on Improved Vector Evaluated Genetic Algorithm

Abstract: Satellite scheduling is a typical multi-peak, many-valley, nonlinear multi-objective optimization problem. How to effectively implement the satellite scheduling is a crucial research in space areas.This paper mainly discusses the performance of VEGA (Vector Evaluated Genetic Algorithm) based on the study of basic principles of VEGA algorithm, algorithm realization and test function, and then improves VEGA algorithm through introducing vector coding, new crossover and mutation operators, new methods to assign f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…greedy approaches (Bianchessi & Righini, 2008;Wang et al, 2011) or local searches (Bonissone et al, 2006)) and metaheuristic algorithms (e.g. tabu searches (Habet et al, 2010;Vasquez & Hao, 2003;Bianchessi et al, 2007), genetic algorithms (Mao et al, 2012;Sun et al, 2010;Xhafa et al, 2012Xhafa et al, , 2013, evolutionary algorithms (Bonissone et al, 2006;Salman et al, 2015), and simulated annealing algorithms (Yao et al, 2010;Xhafa et al, 2013)). While these optimization techniques show improvements towards obtaining the optimal or near-optimal solutions, they typically require extensive parameter tuning and cannot provide quality guarantees for the obtained solutions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…greedy approaches (Bianchessi & Righini, 2008;Wang et al, 2011) or local searches (Bonissone et al, 2006)) and metaheuristic algorithms (e.g. tabu searches (Habet et al, 2010;Vasquez & Hao, 2003;Bianchessi et al, 2007), genetic algorithms (Mao et al, 2012;Sun et al, 2010;Xhafa et al, 2012Xhafa et al, , 2013, evolutionary algorithms (Bonissone et al, 2006;Salman et al, 2015), and simulated annealing algorithms (Yao et al, 2010;Xhafa et al, 2013)). While these optimization techniques show improvements towards obtaining the optimal or near-optimal solutions, they typically require extensive parameter tuning and cannot provide quality guarantees for the obtained solutions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the swing angle and rotation angle of the resource must be set to point at the target. Thus, a setup time between two consecutive successful observations has to be considered to adjust the orientation of the resource (Mao et al, 2012). While the number of EOS is continuously increasing, so is the number of observation requests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical Earth observation satellite has up to 10 opportunities to acquire the image of a target every day, while the number of requested missions can be hundreds [3][4][5]. This situation necessitates the selection and scheduling of imaging tasks to maximize the benefits obtainable by operating satellites [6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the successive researches, non-dominating sorting genetic algorithms (NSGA, Srinvas and Deb 1994), multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA), vector evaluated genetic algorithm (VEGA) were designed with variants of GA, and have been applied to various MOO problems [1,2,4]. Similar to GA, PSO was also incorporated with Pareto dominance, algorithm known as multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOP-SO) was proposed by Coello Coello (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%