2012
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2011.2176130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Simulation and Analysis of Quantum Ballistic Transport in Nanodevices With AWE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar procedure has been applied recently in Ref. 45 for the current flow through ballistic nanodevices but in the absence of magnetic field. After solution of the quantum scattering problem we evaluate the conductance by the Landauer-Büttiker formula…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar procedure has been applied recently in Ref. 45 for the current flow through ballistic nanodevices but in the absence of magnetic field. After solution of the quantum scattering problem we evaluate the conductance by the Landauer-Büttiker formula…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our simulation, the device parameters are L g = 10 nm, L s = L d = 4 nm, W ch = 5 nm, and W ox = 1 nm; doping density is N + = 10 26 /m 3 ; the relative permittivity of silicon is 11.9; and relative permittivity of the silicon dioxide is 3.8. Other parameters can be found in [7].…”
Section: Simple Heterogeneous Poisson Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is N + = 10 26 /m 3 ; the relative permittivity of silicon is 11.9; and relative permittivity of the silicon dioxide is 3.8. Other parameters can be found in [7].…”
Section: Complex Poisson Problem With Dirichlet Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the effective mass approximation, 4,8 the self-energy matrices can be obtained for the whole energy band once the eigenmodes of the leads are solved. 10 Beyond the effective mass approximation, such as the ab initio methods 11 and the empirical tight-binding approaches, 9 however, the self-energy matrices must be evaluated for each energy point individually, further increasing the computational burden. The tight binding models will be the focus of this work, as they are well-suited for nanodevice modeling due to limited-range interactions and reasonably sized basis sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%