2008
DOI: 10.14778/1453856.1453967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient skyline querying with variable user preferences on nominal attributes

Abstract: Current skyline evaluation techniques assume a fixed ordering on the attributes. However, dynamic preferences on nominal attributes are more realistic in known applications. In order to generate online response for any such preference issued by a user, one obvious solution is to enumerate all possible preferences and materialize all results of these preferences. However, the pre-processing and storage requirements of a full materialization are typically prohibitive. Instead, we propose a semi-materialization m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it is not possible to list a complete survey of all papers, we mention a few here. Algorithms using the bitmap method [25] and for partially-ordered attributes to capture dynamic user preferences [6,5,32,22] , computing cardinality or exploiting low cardinality domains [7,17], sliding window or time-series skyline queries [15,27,12,35], distributed and super-peer architectures [2,31,36,19], representative skylines [26], probabilistic skylines on uncertain data [20] have been studied. We mention the streaming and distributed related works again in Sections 3 and 5.1 respectively.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since it is not possible to list a complete survey of all papers, we mention a few here. Algorithms using the bitmap method [25] and for partially-ordered attributes to capture dynamic user preferences [6,5,32,22] , computing cardinality or exploiting low cardinality domains [7,17], sliding window or time-series skyline queries [15,27,12,35], distributed and super-peer architectures [2,31,36,19], representative skylines [26], probabilistic skylines on uncertain data [20] have been studied. We mention the streaming and distributed related works again in Sections 3 and 5.1 respectively.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This version of our algorithm on posets can be adapted to compute skylines with partially-ordered domains (see, e.g., [6,32,33,22] and references therein).…”
Section: Posetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent work by Wong et al [24] studies the efficient computation of skylines on datasets with dynamic preferences on nominal attributes. Nominal attributes do not have a pre-defined (i.e., objective) order, but a custom-based preference for their values can be set.…”
Section: Skyline Queriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skyline for such data can be computed by an indexindependent method (e.g., [3]), but index-based methods cannot be applied because it is infeasible to maintain an index for each of the (exponentially many) possible orderings. In view of this, [24] proposes a technique, which precomputes and materializes the skylines for a subset of the possible orderings of the nominal attributes. Given a skyline query with arbitrary user preferences on the nominal attributes, the technique computes the result efficiently from the materialized skylines.…”
Section: Skyline Queriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skyline query, as an efficient tool for preference-based data analysis [27,13], has attracted a lot of attention in the database community. It has a wide range of real applications [8,26] and it can easily be incorporated into commercial database systems, as SQL is being extended with clauses for the support of preference queries [3,10,19,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%