Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101)
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2000.900937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiently estimating projective transformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radke et al [96] consider the problem of estimating projective transformations associated with standard problems in image processing and computer vision. The estimation problem leads to the minimization of a nonlinear functional of eight parameters, which, through a separation argument, can be reduced to a problem in only two variables.…”
Section: Robotics and Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radke et al [96] consider the problem of estimating projective transformations associated with standard problems in image processing and computer vision. The estimation problem leads to the minimization of a nonlinear functional of eight parameters, which, through a separation argument, can be reduced to a problem in only two variables.…”
Section: Robotics and Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The projective transformations and were estimated using the efficient algorithm described in [25], using point matches extracted by the automatic feature selection algorithm described in [26]. The measurement update used an 8-pixel search neighborhood about the time-updated estimate and the Ohta-Kanade cost function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Translation of the camera point of view combined with camera tilt (pitch and roll) cause perspective distortions of the acquired images that require more complex transformations such as 8 parameter projective transformation [6]. There are two means of recovering these parameters: (1) manually choosing (at least) four tie points in each image to be co-registered (perhaps by pre-arranged insertion of features into the scene) and solving eight equations for eight unknown parameters [7]; or (2) formulation of a non-quadratic minimization problem for pixel value differences and consequent numerical solution using Levenberg-Marquardt [1] or other scheme. Both methods have drawbacks: human intervention in the first, and in second case inhomogeneous illumination associated with camera and light source motion, which makes the optimization problem be ill-defined.…”
Section: Video Image Mosaicingmentioning
confidence: 99%