2005
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30579-8_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiently Verifiable Conditions for Deadlock-Freedom of Large Concurrent Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We generalize previous works [2][3][4] by removing the requirement that interaction between processes be expressed pairwise, and also by applying to BIP [6], a framework from which efficient distributed code can be generated. In contrast, the model of concurrency in [2][3][4] requires shared memory read-modify-write operations with a large grain of atomicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We generalize previous works [2][3][4] by removing the requirement that interaction between processes be expressed pairwise, and also by applying to BIP [6], a framework from which efficient distributed code can be generated. In contrast, the model of concurrency in [2][3][4] requires shared memory read-modify-write operations with a large grain of atomicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7] one can find a condition that ensures the deadlock-freedom of a component based system consisting of two components. In [4] a condition for deadlock-freedom in a strictly interleaving setting of processes that communicate over shared variables is presented. Interface automata [10] have been introduced as a means to specify component interfaces with behavioral types.…”
Section: Discussion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A A respectively liveness without A A is at least as hard. One way to deal with the complexity issue for properties is to establish conditions that ensure a desired property and can be tested more easily, see for example [22,18,19,26]. In this paper we want to explain how one can systematically use such conditions to obtain results in the case of failure of A .…”
Section: Testing Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%