2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11573-014-0749-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effort provision in entrepreneurial teams: effects of team size, free-riding and peer pressure

Abstract: This paper analyzes whether effort provision in entrepreneurial teams depends on the size of the team, assuming that size determines the strength of freeriding and peer pressure effects in entrepreneurial teams. We provide a theoretical model and empirical analyses to explain the joint effect of free-riding and peer pressure on effort in start-up teams. We begin with an economic model by Kandel and Lazear in J Polit Econ 100(4):801-817, (1992) and enrich it using insights from entrepreneurship research. Based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of an entrepreneurial team can generate advantages by synergizing skills, knowledge and resources (among other aspects), while increasing the likelihood of different opinions on specific issues, and differing strategic views and personal interests when it comes to distributing expenses and returns. Conversely, this diversity can lead to an increase in conflict, which requires coordination and negotiation over time to be able to act as a team not as a group (Backes-Gellner et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of an entrepreneurial team can generate advantages by synergizing skills, knowledge and resources (among other aspects), while increasing the likelihood of different opinions on specific issues, and differing strategic views and personal interests when it comes to distributing expenses and returns. Conversely, this diversity can lead to an increase in conflict, which requires coordination and negotiation over time to be able to act as a team not as a group (Backes-Gellner et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the 'small world' concept (Milgram 1967;Watts and Strogatz 1998), new players will most likely connect with their neighbors, but do not build 'long-range' relationships with older players. Backes-Gellner et al (2014) assume the same decreasing level of network contribution in an entrepreneurial context: they hypothesize that the incremental efforts of team founders reduce with a growing team size and should thus follow an inverted U-shaped pattern. Based on this related research, we assume that additional users generate a decreasing incremental value to the overall network in MMO games.…”
Section: Development Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in team sports, the literature has used numerous variables to appraise the coworker productivity of a player: the number of goals scored, assists provided, duels won, ball touches, etc. Yet, each of these numbers suffers from the fact that it imputes an output (successful action) to an individual player, while this output is actually the joint product of the player and the teammates: a player can only perform well when the other teammates 1 If cooperation and coordination is not successful, problems like free-riding can arise in teams, analyzed for example by Guillen et al (2014), Backes-Gellner et al (2015), and .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%