2018
DOI: 10.34256/ajir1813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EFL Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions towards the Use of CALL in the English Language Classrooms

Abstract: This study aimed to investigate English as a Foreign Language (EFL) pre-service teachers’ perceptions towards the use of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) in the English Language Classrooms concerning the teachers’ computer competence and their perceptions of CALL after creating and using their own CALL in language teaching. The participants were EFL pre-service teachers studying in the faculty of education, Mahasarakham University, Thailand. Questionnaires were used to collect the data after teaching… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, most of the literature assesses pre-service teachers' technology proficiency (Atar, Aydın, & Bağcı, 2019;Basal, 2015a;Başal & Kaynak, 2020;Hana, 2020;İşler & Yıldırım, 2018;Liza & Andriyanti, 2020;Pace, Rodesiler, & Tripp, 2010;Raman, 2014;Sarıçoban, Tosuncuoğlu, & Kırmızı, 2019;Schieble, 2010;Solak & Çakır, 2014;Tachaiyaphum & Hoffman, 2018;Tseng, Cheng, & Yeh, 2019), but they are already digital natives and proficient technology users (Howlett & Waemusa, 2018;Lee & James, 2018). However, there are limited number of studies that assess perceived technology proficiency of in-service teachers, more specifically that of Turkish teachers of English, (Akturk & Ozturk, 2019;Ardıç & Çiftçi, 2019;Ergen, 2019;Köse, 2016;Özel & Arıkan, 2015), most of whom are digital immigrants (Howlett & Waemusa, 2018;Lee & James, 2018;Prensky, 2001) and might be incompetent users of technology.…”
Section: Problem Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, most of the literature assesses pre-service teachers' technology proficiency (Atar, Aydın, & Bağcı, 2019;Basal, 2015a;Başal & Kaynak, 2020;Hana, 2020;İşler & Yıldırım, 2018;Liza & Andriyanti, 2020;Pace, Rodesiler, & Tripp, 2010;Raman, 2014;Sarıçoban, Tosuncuoğlu, & Kırmızı, 2019;Schieble, 2010;Solak & Çakır, 2014;Tachaiyaphum & Hoffman, 2018;Tseng, Cheng, & Yeh, 2019), but they are already digital natives and proficient technology users (Howlett & Waemusa, 2018;Lee & James, 2018). However, there are limited number of studies that assess perceived technology proficiency of in-service teachers, more specifically that of Turkish teachers of English, (Akturk & Ozturk, 2019;Ardıç & Çiftçi, 2019;Ergen, 2019;Köse, 2016;Özel & Arıkan, 2015), most of whom are digital immigrants (Howlett & Waemusa, 2018;Lee & James, 2018;Prensky, 2001) and might be incompetent users of technology.…”
Section: Problem Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Majority of teachers believed that computerized games improve the quality of teaching and learning outcomes, promote the development of language skills, and increase the motivation of learners to learn English language and their ability to retain information. Similarly, Tachaiyaphum and Hoffman (2018) investigated English as a Foreign Language (EFL) preservice teachers' perception towards the use of CALL in Thailand. The findings indicate that teachers exhibited positive perception regarding the use of CALL in language teaching practices.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies had focused on the students and teachers' perceptions on the use of technology in form of computer assisted language (Dias & Bocorny, 2014;Madsen et al, 2018;Mollaei & Riasati, 2013;Öz, 2014;Ozturk, 2012;Park & Son, 2009;Rakicioglu-soylemez & Akayoglu, 2016;Shin & Son, 2007;Tachaiyaphum & Hoffman, 2018;Topkaya, 2010;S. Wang & Heffernan, 2010;Yükselir, 2016;Zare-ee, 2011).…”
Section:  Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%