2000
DOI: 10.3354/meps196269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Egg cannibalism in Baltic sprat Sprattus sprattus

Abstract: Throughout the last 2 decades a shift from a cod-to a sprat-dominated system occurred in the upper trophic levels of the Central Baltic Sea. This was caused by a decline in the cod stock, due to recruitment failure and high fishing intens~ty, resulting in a decrease in predation pressure on sprat. Concurrently with the lowest cod stock size on record, sprat reached biomass values of above 2 X 106 t in 1992, being relatively stable afterwards. Besides predation mortality through cod and in recent years also an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In inflow situations, when oxygenated water occurred over the whole water column, the maximum average depth of capture encountered in 1994, a year when anoxic conditions did not exist in the basin, was utilised as dwelling depths of clupeids. Applying a linear relationship between the ratio of hourly consumption and egg abundance with the vertical predator-prey overlap index (n = 8; sprat: r 2 = 0.77, herring: r 2 = 0.42) enabled the prediction of consumption rates by predator populations (Köster and Möllmann 2000b) for the main spawning periods in May 1976May -1992. For the period from 1993 on, characterised by late cod spawning activity , the mean observed consumption relative to cod egg availability was utilised.…”
Section: Predation On Cod Eggs By Clupeidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In inflow situations, when oxygenated water occurred over the whole water column, the maximum average depth of capture encountered in 1994, a year when anoxic conditions did not exist in the basin, was utilised as dwelling depths of clupeids. Applying a linear relationship between the ratio of hourly consumption and egg abundance with the vertical predator-prey overlap index (n = 8; sprat: r 2 = 0.77, herring: r 2 = 0.42) enabled the prediction of consumption rates by predator populations (Köster and Möllmann 2000b) for the main spawning periods in May 1976May -1992. For the period from 1993 on, characterised by late cod spawning activity , the mean observed consumption relative to cod egg availability was utilised.…”
Section: Predation On Cod Eggs By Clupeidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flatness of the curves suggests a wide range of spawner biomass over which recruitment may vary independently of spawner biomass. The flatness indicates that density-dependent processes such as egg cannibalism (Köster and Möllmann 2000) are not strong enough to cause declines in recruitment substantially below maximum recruitment.…”
Section: Sprat Recruitment Dynamics and Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laurence and Howell (1981) stated that "it is hard to attach any significance in an ecological sense to differences spanning only 0.6 days", which they found as a statistically significant result of accelerated egg development at increased salinity (range 28 to 38) in yellowtail flounder (Limanda ferruginea). However, for the situation of sprat in the Central Baltic Sea, reduced egg development time could be beneficial for survival due to a high predation pressure on eggs by clupeids (Köster and Möllmann, 2000). Sprat eggs in this study were also incubated in salinity conditions exceeding the natural range experienced in the central Baltic Sea (30 and 35), but development time remained the same in all experiments.…”
Section: Egg Development Duration and Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Köster and Möllmann, 2000) conditions experienced by early life stages (ELS). Sprat in the Baltic Sea inhabits waters with the lowest salinities and temperatures experienced by this species (Muus and Nielsen, 1999) and displays adaptations to the environment (Kändler, 1941;Parmanne et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%