2016
DOI: 10.17051/io.2016.35708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eğitim Liderliği ve Yönetimi Kapsamında 2012 Yılında Yayınlanmış Olan Makalelerin Amaç ve Yöntem Bakımından Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract: ÖZ. Eğitim liderliği ve yönetimi kapsamında yayımlanmış olan araştırmaların, ülkelerin eğitim sistemlerine nasıl liderlik edildiği ve yönetildiği konusunda mevcut durumu ortaya koyması ve geleceğe yönelik projeksiyonlarda bulunması bakımından önemli olduğu düşünülmektedir. Bu araştırmada 2012 yılında Educational Administration Quarterly (EAQ), International Journal of Educational Management (IJEM) ve School Leadership & Management (SLM) dergilerindeki araştırmaların, amaç ve yöntem alt başlıkları altında incel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, 8% of them used mixed method while this percentage is only 3% in this study. Gülmez & Yavuz (2016) also pointed out that qualitative studies had an impetus in the last years in the literature of educational leadership and management. Yücel-Toy (2015) states that although quantitative studies are dominant, there has been an increase in the number of qualitative and mixed studies since 2000.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Besides, 8% of them used mixed method while this percentage is only 3% in this study. Gülmez & Yavuz (2016) also pointed out that qualitative studies had an impetus in the last years in the literature of educational leadership and management. Yücel-Toy (2015) states that although quantitative studies are dominant, there has been an increase in the number of qualitative and mixed studies since 2000.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include studies on educational sciences in general (Adıgüzel & Ergünay, 2012;Göktaş, Hasançebi et al 2012;Keselman, et al 1998), educational administration (Gülmez & Yavuz, 2016;Karadağ, 2015;Turan et al 2014), educational technology (Göktaş, Küçük, et al 2012;Gülbahar & Alper, 2009;Hrastinski & Keller, 2007;Hwang &Tsai, 2011;Küçük, Aydemir, Yıldırım, Arpacık & Göktaş, 2013;Şimşek, et al, 2008), curriculum and instruction (Ozan & Köse, 2014), primary school teacher education (Küçükoğlu & Ozan, 2013), special education (Yıldız et al 2016), language education (Varışoğlu et al 2013), teacher education (Yücel-Toy, 2015, mathematics education (Yücedağ & Erdoğan, 2011), environmental education International Journal of Instruction, July 2017• Vol.10, No.3 (Erdoğan, Marcinkowski & Ok, 2009, preschool education (Yılmaz & Altınkurt, 2012) and science education (Tsai & Wen, 2005). Content analysis studies in this sense form the basis of comparative studies and puts forth the research trends (Cohen et al 2005).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of the subject, it has been determined that the most studied topic in the articles in the journals examined is "leadership". In the studies of Gülmez and Yavuz (2016), Bush and Crawford (2012), Örücü and Şimşek (2011) and Hallinger (2013), it is emphasized that the most studied subject is "leadership" in the articles examined in the scope of the researches. The importance of showing leadership roles of school principals in organizational culture, increasing leadership activities abroad and determining the types of leadership that leaders show are important for creating effective schools; it can be said that it has increased the work in the field of leadership.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%