2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icdmw.2014.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EgoLP: Fast and Distributed Community Detection in Billion-Node Social Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coscia et al [16] improved over their clustering method by proposing to use a more sophisticated label propagation ego-net partitioning technique. Several authors have since built on such a line of work to improve the scalability and accuracy of ego-net based clustering [10,19,20,33,33], while others have designed ego-net analysis methods that tackle user metadata on top of the ego-net connectivity [31,32,49].…”
Section: Ego-net Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coscia et al [16] improved over their clustering method by proposing to use a more sophisticated label propagation ego-net partitioning technique. Several authors have since built on such a line of work to improve the scalability and accuracy of ego-net based clustering [10,19,20,33,33], while others have designed ego-net analysis methods that tackle user metadata on top of the ego-net connectivity [31,32,49].…”
Section: Ego-net Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the emergence of massive networks that cannot be handled in the main memory of a single computer, new clustering schemes have been proposed for advanced models of computation [9,49]. Since such algorithms typically use hierarchical input representations, quality results of small benchmarks may not be generalizable to larger instances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For disjoint clusters we also compare it with the implementation that is part of NetworKit [35]. Using NetworKit, we evaluate the results of Infomap [32], Louvain [7] and OSLOM [23], three stateof-the-art clustering algorithms [8,11,14], and compare them using the adjusted rand measure [19] and NMI [12]. Further, we examine the average local clustering coefficient, a measure for the percentage of closed triangles which shows the presence of locally denser areas as expected in communities [20].…”
Section: Qualitative Comparison Of Em-lfrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the implementation is capable of producing graphs with more than 1 × 10 10 edges in 17 h. 9 Using the same time budget, the original implementation generates graphs more than two orders of magnitude smaller. 8 We consider such vertices unrealistically (simple) as they have only degree 1 and account for ≈84 % of nodes in the original graph.…”
Section: Em-esmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation