2000
DOI: 10.1162/016366000561231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Egypt: Stable, but for how long?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Arab Uprisings have the potential to change this pattern and pave the way for further public opinion research that could help scholars test some of the theories developed to explain voting behaviour, such as economic voting and religious, ethnic, and other social cleavages. In general, most of the research conducted so far focuses on explaining mass support for the Islamist movements and parties in the region, and the majority of those studies focus on either the organisational characteristics of the Islamist movements (Yavuz 1997;Langohr 2004;Layachi 2004;Hamid 2011;Hasan 2012), the welfare provisions they provide to their supporters (Alterman 2000;Hamzeh 2001;Ismail 2001;Bayat 2002;Öniş 2006), or the ideological hegemony that Islamism has generated over time (Wickham 2002;Garcia-Rivero and Kotzé 2007;Esposito 2008; Davis and Robinson 2012). 1 The electoral victory of the Islamist Ennahda in Tunisia in the 2011 elections was interpreted as another example of the political success of the Islamist movements in the Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Arab Uprisings have the potential to change this pattern and pave the way for further public opinion research that could help scholars test some of the theories developed to explain voting behaviour, such as economic voting and religious, ethnic, and other social cleavages. In general, most of the research conducted so far focuses on explaining mass support for the Islamist movements and parties in the region, and the majority of those studies focus on either the organisational characteristics of the Islamist movements (Yavuz 1997;Langohr 2004;Layachi 2004;Hamid 2011;Hasan 2012), the welfare provisions they provide to their supporters (Alterman 2000;Hamzeh 2001;Ismail 2001;Bayat 2002;Öniş 2006), or the ideological hegemony that Islamism has generated over time (Wickham 2002;Garcia-Rivero and Kotzé 2007;Esposito 2008; Davis and Robinson 2012). 1 The electoral victory of the Islamist Ennahda in Tunisia in the 2011 elections was interpreted as another example of the political success of the Islamist movements in the Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some theorists claim this constitutes an exchange of favors for votes (Alterman, 2000; Flanigan, 2008; Hamzeh, 2001). Yet Clark (2004b) argues that these activities are different from the traditional clientelistic networks because they are based on “horizontal networks” between group members working toward a common goal: to provide services to citizens to promote the party's goals (Roháč, 2013, p. 267).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This serves them especially well during elections: A common (albeit unsubstantiated) claim is that providing social welfare acts as a form of vote-buying. In other words, service provision builds electoral support for Islamists because voters express their gratitude at the ballot box (Alterman 2000, Hamzeh 2001, Malka 2007, Flanigan 2008). …”
Section: Sources Of the Islamist Political Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%