2019
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2019.2908129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eigendecomposition-Free Sampling Set Selection for Graph Signals

Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of selecting an optimal sampling set for signals on graphs. The proposed sampling set selection (SSS) is based on a localization operator that can consider both vertex domain and spectral domain localization. We clarify the relationships among the proposed method, sensor position selection methods in machine learning, and conventional SSS methods based on graph frequency. In contrast to the conventional graph signal processing-based approaches, the proposed method does not need… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare our method with classical graph sampling strategies, we conduct experiments on small-size datasets, where the matrix is completed by dual smoothness based method (2). Two relatively low-complexity classical methods called graph weight coherence (GWC) [30] and localized operator coverage (LOC) [33] are implemented, which select samples on matrix L p = I n ⊗L r +L c ⊗I m directly. Authors in [26] proposed a structured sampling method to collect data assuming the matrix signal is (η 1 , η 2 )-bandlimited on the product graph.…”
Section: • Intelligent Sampling Improves Matrix Completion Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To compare our method with classical graph sampling strategies, we conduct experiments on small-size datasets, where the matrix is completed by dual smoothness based method (2). Two relatively low-complexity classical methods called graph weight coherence (GWC) [30] and localized operator coverage (LOC) [33] are implemented, which select samples on matrix L p = I n ⊗L r +L c ⊗I m directly. Authors in [26] proposed a structured sampling method to collect data assuming the matrix signal is (η 1 , η 2 )-bandlimited on the product graph.…”
Section: • Intelligent Sampling Improves Matrix Completion Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then propose an iterative sampling strategy that efficiently collects a variable number of samples block-wise on the two smaller factor graphs alternately. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets show that our proposed graph sampling methods achieve smaller RMSE than competing sampling schemes for matrix completion [26,30,33], when combined with different state-of-the-art matrix completion methods [7,24,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where p(·) denotes probability density function. The Bayesian solution is provided by the design that maximizes (5). Select the utility function that describes the information gain inf K after sampling, then the expected utility can be given as…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the topics of interest in GSP is graph sampling theory [1]- [10] which is aimed at recovering a graph signal Y. Tanaka is with the Graduate School of BASE, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan. Y. Tanaka is also with PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan (email: ytnk@cc.tuat.ac.jp).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%