2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10543-012-0389-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eigenvalue enclosures and convergence for the linearized MHD operator

Abstract: We discuss how to compute certified enclosures for the eigenvalues of benchmark linear magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) operators in the plane slab and cylindrical pinch configurations. For the plane slab, our method relies upon the formulation of an eigenvalue problem associated to the Schur complement, leading to highly accurate upper bounds for the eigenvalue. For the cylindrical configuration, a direct application of this formulation is possible, however, it cannot be rigourously justified. Therefore in this cas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the numerical experiments of this section we have "abused" slightly the notation and written the index as j for the eigenvalues of both H har and H anh . Figure 1 shows n versus the size of the eigenvalue enclosure λj,up − λ j,low , for λj,up > λj an upper bound found from (7) and λ j,low < λj a lower bound found from (6). In this figure the slopes are fairly close to 4, indicating that the convergence rates established in Theorem 5.3 are optimal.…”
Section: Eigenvalue Bounds and Order Of Convergencementioning
confidence: 74%
“…In the numerical experiments of this section we have "abused" slightly the notation and written the index as j for the eigenvalues of both H har and H anh . Figure 1 shows n versus the size of the eigenvalue enclosure λj,up − λ j,low , for λj,up > λj an upper bound found from (7) and λ j,low < λj a lower bound found from (6). In this figure the slopes are fairly close to 4, indicating that the convergence rates established in Theorem 5.3 are optimal.…”
Section: Eigenvalue Bounds and Order Of Convergencementioning
confidence: 74%
“…We also note the relatively poor performance of the quadratic methods. The latter is not entirely surprising as the known convergence rates for quadratic methods are measured in terms of δ A (L({λ}), L n ), i.e., the distance of the eigenspace to the trial space with respect to the graph norm; see [8,Lemma 2] and [28, Section 6].…”
Section: Further Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 5.1 It is not the target of the method developed in this work the eigenvalue MHD problem [14]. Since the requirements for a method to be useful for initial and boundary value problems, viz.…”
Section: Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%