2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eight-year-olds, but not six-year-olds, perform just as well as adults when playing Concentration: Resolving the enigma?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this memory game, participants flip two cards over on each turn, with the goal of uncovering matching pairs of pictures. Although there were no age differences in the number of trials it took participants to uncover all of the pairs, 5- to 9-year-old children were more efficient: They were more likely to find the pair as soon as they knew the location of both pictures ( Baker-Ward & Ornstein, 1988 ; cf., Krøjgaard et al, 2019 ; Schumann-Hengsteler, 1996 ). Five-year-olds also made fewer spatial errors (i.e., selecting an incorrect card that is adjacent to the correct card) than older children and adults ( Schumann-Hengsteler, 1996 ).…”
Section: When Are Younger Children Better Than Older Children and Adu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this memory game, participants flip two cards over on each turn, with the goal of uncovering matching pairs of pictures. Although there were no age differences in the number of trials it took participants to uncover all of the pairs, 5- to 9-year-old children were more efficient: They were more likely to find the pair as soon as they knew the location of both pictures ( Baker-Ward & Ornstein, 1988 ; cf., Krøjgaard et al, 2019 ; Schumann-Hengsteler, 1996 ). Five-year-olds also made fewer spatial errors (i.e., selecting an incorrect card that is adjacent to the correct card) than older children and adults ( Schumann-Hengsteler, 1996 ).…”
Section: When Are Younger Children Better Than Older Children and Adu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this particular study, the AOIs were large and it may have only impacted on boundaries such as navigation icons that are adjacent to the next AOI. Other studies have reported the accuracy [28,91], however care needs to be taken as accuracy is often based on the manufacturers data obtained in ideal test conditions and in the real world the accuracy may sometimes be higher [92]. There are many challenges identified in obtaining eye tracking data from children, despite this there is a growing number of publications evidencing the effectiveness of modern eye trackers for use in studies with children.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%