Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive

Swift, Edward J.; Perdigão, Jorge; Heymann, Harald O.; Wilder, Aldridge D.; Bayne, Stephen C.; May, Kenneth N.; Sturdevant, John R.; Roberson, Theodore M.

doi:10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00050-6

Cited by 91 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…SU fulfilled the ADA guidelines 23 on the basis of the 18-month recall data, as this clinical study demonstrated no greater incidence of clinical failures than 10%, regardless of the bonding strategy used. We failed to reject the first null hypothesis, as there were no statistical differences in the clinical retention rates at 18 months for the different bonding strategies tested in this study.…”

Section: Reasons Total Loss Of Restorationmentioning

confidence: 70%

“…This percentage is very similar to what was previously reported in clinical trials that used the USPHS-modified criteria after 18 months of evaluation. 23,25,35,43,44 On the other hand, marginal integrity was statistically worse for SE when assessed with the FDI criteria, specifically when SQUACE was used.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…20,[36][37][38] Most clinical studies reporting clinical evaluation of NCCL restorations still use the USPHS criteria. 23,[25][26][27][28][29][30][39][40][41][42] One study, 36 published as an abstract, concluded that the FDI criteria were more sensitive for identifying differences in the restorations than the USPHS criteria. A more recent publication 20 compared the six-month clinical behavior of several adhesion strategies using both FDI and USPHS-modified criteria.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The degree of sclerotic dentin was measured according to the criteria described by Swift and others 23 ( Table 1). The cavity dimensions in millimeters (height, width, and depth) and the geometry of the cavity (evaluated by profile photograph and labeled at ,458, 458-908, For the calibration procedure step, the study director placed one restoration of each group in order to identify all steps involved in the application technique.…”

Section: Interventions: Restorative Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A New Universal Simplified Adhesive: 18-Month Clinical Evaluation

Perdigão

Kose

Mena-Serrano

et al. 2014

Operative Dentistry

Self Cite

243

185

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At 18 months, the new multimode adhesive, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, fulfilled the American Dental Association criteria required for full approval. Its clinical behavior is reliable when used in noncarious cervical lesions and may not depend on the bonding strategy. SUMMARYPurpose: To evaluate the 18-month clinical performance of a multimode adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, SU, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria.Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine patients participated in this study. Two-hundred restorations were assigned to four groups: ERm, etch-and-rinse + moist dentin; ERd, etch-andrinse + dry dentin; Set, selective enamel etching; and SE, self-etch. The composite resin, Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE), was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, and at 18 months, using both the World Dental Federation (FDI) , 2014, 39-2, 113-127 bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS criteria and 38%, 40%, 36%, and 44% for groups ERm, ERd, Set, and SE, respectively, when the FDI criteria were applied (p.0.05). However, when semiquantitative scores (or SQUACE) for marginal adaptation were used, SE resulted in a significantly greater number of restorations, with more than 30% of the total length of the interface showing marginal discrepancy (28%) in comparison with the other groups (8%, 6%, and 8%, respectively, for ERm, ERd, and Set).Conclusions: The clinical retention of the multimode adhesive at 18 months does not depend on the bonding strategy. The only differences between strategies were found for the parameter marginal adaptation, for which the FDI criteria were more sensitive than the USPHS criteria.

show abstract

Section: Reasons Total Loss Of Restorationmentioning

confidence: 70%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Interventions: Restorative Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A New Universal Simplified Adhesive: 18-Month Clinical Evaluation

Perdigão

Kose

Mena-Serrano

et al. 2014

Operative Dentistry

Self Cite

243

185

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All the restorations were evaluated at baseline and after six months, one year, two years and three years of clinical use. The restorations were examined using the modified Ryge criteria (USPHS) [16][17][18] for retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity and secondary caries ( …”

Section: Evaluation Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Performance of a Two-step Self-etch Adhesive with Additional Enamel Etching in Class III Cavities

Ermiş¹,

Temel²,

Çelik³

et al. 2010

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study evaluated the effect of additional enamel etching on the clinical performance of Class III composite restorations bonded with a mild two-step self-etch adhesive system in a three-year evaluation of clinical service.Methods: Using a paired-tooth study design, 38 patients received at least one pair of restorations. In each paired cavity, a mild two-step selfetch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond) was used, either with (C-SE etch) or without additional enamel etching, using phosphoric acid (C-SE non-etch). Clearfil AP-X was used as the restorative material for all restorations. Evaluation of the restorations was performed at baseline and after six months, one year, two years and three years of clinical service in terms of retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity and secondary caries using the modified Ryge criteria.Results: A retention rate of 100% both for the C-SE non-etch and C-SE etch groups was noted. Significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the marginal discoloration

show abstract

One-year clinical evaluation of a flowable resin liner associated with a microhybrid resin in noncarious cervical lesions

et al. 2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance over 1 year of a microhybrid composite resin for class V restorations both lined and not lined with a flowable composite resin. Nineteen patients having at least two pairs of cervical noncarious lesions under occlusion were enrolled in this study. A total of 38 restorations were placed, half for each group (Single-Bond + Filtek-Flow + Filtek Z250, and Single-Bond + Filtek Z250). Two calibrated operators placed all restorations according to the manufacturers' instructions. Two other independent examiners evaluated the restorations at baseline and after a 12-month period according to the USPHS criteria and modified criteria for color match. The classic alpha score was divided into A1 for "not detectable" and A2 for "slightly discernible" filling. Statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher's exact test and McNemar's test (P=0.05). One restoration was lost after 12 months for each group (retention rate 95% for each group). After 12 months, 18 restorations showed a trend towards dark yellowing (color match A2). The use of Filtek Flow as a liner under Filtek Z250 restorations did not improve the clinical performance of class V restorations after 6 and 12 months of evaluation.

show abstract

Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive

Cited by 91 publications

References 6 publications

A New Universal Simplified Adhesive: 18-Month Clinical Evaluation

A New Universal Simplified Adhesive: 18-Month Clinical Evaluation

Clinical Performance of a Two-step Self-etch Adhesive with Additional Enamel Etching in Class III Cavities

One-year clinical evaluation of a flowable resin liner associated with a microhybrid resin in noncarious cervical lesions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About