Eine Validierung des AOFAS-Ankle-Hindfoot-Scale für den deutschen Sprachraum

Kostuj, Tanja; Schaper, Katharina; Baums, Mike H.; Lieske, Sebastian

doi:10.1016/j.fuspru.2014.02.002

Cited by 20 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Anhand der Akten wurde der postoperative Verlauf bewertet. Die Nachuntersuchungen erfassten funktionelles Ergebnis (Foot Function Index [FFI] [13], Ankle/Hindfoot Scale der American Or-thopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) [14]), gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität (SF-36v2) [15] und radiologisches Ergebnis (Fehlverheilung, Pseudarthrose, Arthrose, Nekrose). Die Ergebnisse des AOFAS wurden in die Kriterien "sehr gut" (90-100 Punkte), "gut" (80-89 Punkte), "mittelmäßig" (70-79 Punkte) und "schlecht" (69 oder weniger Punkte) unterteilt [16].…”

Section: Klinische Und Radiologische Nachuntersuchungunclassified

Surgical Treatment of Talar Neck and Body Fractures: Mid-Term Results of 24 Cases

Winning

Adolf²,

Schirrmeister

et al. 2020

Z Orthop Unfall

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Talar neck and body fractures are rare. Major posttraumatic complications with a potential reduction in the quality of life are arthrosis and necrosis due to the specific vascular supply. The aim of the study was to evaluate mid-term results of surgery for talar fractures of neck and body. Parameters that potentially affected/influenced treatment outcomes were analysed exploratively. Methods 24 patients with 24 talar neck and body fractures (Marti type II n = 9, type III n = 12, type IV n = 3) were retrospectively examined for radiological and clinical functional outcomes. The independent parameters evaluated included age (< 40, ≥ 40 years), sex (male, female), general overall extent of injury (polytrauma/multiple injuries/multiple fractures of the extremities, additional injuries to the same foot, isolated talus fracture), soft tissue damage (open, closed), surgical latency (< 6, ≥ 6 h), fracture classification/displacement (undisplaced [= Marti II], displaced [= Marti III, IV]) and fracture type (talar body, neck fracture). The potential influencing parameters were analysed by univariate analyses. Results With an average follow-up of 8.7 years (1,25 – 16 years) the AOFAS score was 71.4 ± 22.9 points, the Foot Function Index score 35.9 ± 28.3 points; the physical and mental component summary scores of the Short Form 36, version 2, was 43.8 ± 10.9 and 47.4 ± 13.6 points (mean ± standard deviation), respectively. Thus, the patient reported physical health of the patients was slightly reduced compared to the German population, while the mental health remained largely unaffected. Two patients developed partial avascular necrosis (8%), 10 patients developed osteoarthritis (42%). Of the independent parameters, only the general overall extent of injury showed a significant influence on osteoarthritis (p = 0.002). In the evaluation of undisplaced (n = 9) and displaced (n = 15) fractures, surgical treatment after more than 6 hours did not result in a worse outcome. Conclusion The clinical outcome of internal fixation of talar neck and body fractures can be classified as good. In the study group, there was no correlation between the occurrence of arthrosis and the Marti fracture classification.

show abstract

Section: Klinische Und Radiologische Nachuntersuchungunclassified

Surgical Treatment of Talar Neck and Body Fractures: Mid-Term Results of 24 Cases

Winning

Adolf²,

Schirrmeister

et al. 2020

Z Orthop Unfall

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additionally, the time required for the evaluation of the nine items of the AHS is lower than for the SF-36, which increases patient compliance in reporting data. Despite methodological criticisms, the AHS is an established and frequently used rating system, making it possible to compare the results with other studies [30,31]. The degrees of correlation and reliability provided an acceptable validity for the subjective scores; however, the reliability of the objective component of the AHS has yet to be reported [29,32].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of Manual Therapy, Customised Foot Orthoses and Combined Therapy in the Management of Plantar Fasciitis—A RCT

Grim

Kramer

Engelhardt

et al. 2019

Sports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is one of the most common causes of plantar heel pain. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of three different treatment approaches in the management of PF. Methods: Sixty-three patients (44 female, 19 men; 48.4 ± 9.8 years) were randomly assigned into a manual therapy (MT), customised foot orthosis (FO) and a combined therapy (combined) group. The primary outcomes of pain and function were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society-Ankle Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS) and the patient reported outcome measure (PROM) Foot Pain and Function Scale (FPFS). Data were evaluated at baseline (T0) and at follow-up sessions after 1 month, 2 months and 3 months (T1–T3). Results: All three treatments showed statistically significant (p < 0.01) improvements in both scales from T0 to T1. However, the MT group showed greater improvements than both other groups (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Manual therapy, customised foot orthoses and combined treatments of PF all reduced pain and function, with the greatest benefits shown by isolated manual therapy.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the physician can fill in a premagnetic resonance imaging score (similar to the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue, or MOCART, score), as well as joint-specific scores, such as the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score (equal to International Knee Documentation Committee, IKDC, objective score) for the knee joint and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) for the ankle joint [ 25 , 26 ]. Investigator’s data entry at 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 60-, and 120-month follow-ups is optional.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Registry for Evaluation of Efficiency and Safety of Surgical Treatment of Cartilage Defects: The German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU)

Maurer¹,

Grotejohann²,

Jenkner³

et al. 2016

JMIR Res Protoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe need for documentation in cartilage defects is as obvious as in other medical specialties. Cartilage defects can cause significant pain, and lead to reduced quality of life and loss of function of the affected joint. The risk of developing osteoarthritis is high. Therefore, the socioeconomic burden of cartilage defects should not be underestimated.ObjectiveThe objective of our study was to implement and maintain a registry of all patients undergoing surgical treatment of cartilage defects.MethodsWe designed this multicenter registry for adults whose cartilage defects of a knee, ankle, or hip joint are treated surgically. The registry consists of two parts: one for the physician and one for the patient. Data for both parts will be gathered at baseline and at 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 60-, and 120-month follow-ups.ResultsTo date, a wide range of German, Swiss, and Austrian trial sites are taking part in the German Cartilage Registry, soon to be followed by further sites. More than 2124 (as of January 31, 2016) cases are already documented and the first publications have been released.ConclusionsThe German Cartilage Registry addresses fundamental issues regarding the current medical care situation of patients with cartilage defects of knee, ankle, and hip joints. In addition, the registry will help to identify various procedure-specific complications, along with putative advantages and disadvantages of different chondrocyte products. It provides an expanding large-scale, unselected, standardized database for cost and care research for further retrospective studies.Trial RegistrationGerman Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00005617; https://drks-neu.uniklinik-freiburg.de/ drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00005617 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6hbFqSws0)

show abstract

Eine Validierung des AOFAS-Ankle-Hindfoot-Scale für den deutschen Sprachraum

Cited by 20 publications

References 13 publications

Surgical Treatment of Talar Neck and Body Fractures: Mid-Term Results of 24 Cases

Surgical Treatment of Talar Neck and Body Fractures: Mid-Term Results of 24 Cases

Effectiveness of Manual Therapy, Customised Foot Orthoses and Combined Therapy in the Management of Plantar Fasciitis—A RCT

A Registry for Evaluation of Efficiency and Safety of Surgical Treatment of Cartilage Defects: The German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About