2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00409.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ejection of Martian meteorites

Abstract: Ejection of Martian meteorites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

18
335
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(361 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
18
335
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…From the mineralogy and texture of NWA 1460, we estimate that it was shocked to no more than $30 GPa and was not shock-heated above $300°C. Several other Martian meteorites shocked to $30 GPa are estimated to have been heated to only $100°C (Fritz et al, 2005). Applying this thermal model to NWA 1460, producing 97% 40 Ar loss by heating NWA 1460 to 300°C during Mars ejection would require its space radius to have been >1 km, clearly impossible values.…”
Section: Validity Of the Ar-ar Agementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the mineralogy and texture of NWA 1460, we estimate that it was shocked to no more than $30 GPa and was not shock-heated above $300°C. Several other Martian meteorites shocked to $30 GPa are estimated to have been heated to only $100°C (Fritz et al, 2005). Applying this thermal model to NWA 1460, producing 97% 40 Ar loss by heating NWA 1460 to 300°C during Mars ejection would require its space radius to have been >1 km, clearly impossible values.…”
Section: Validity Of the Ar-ar Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a thermal model, and ArAr ages and Ar diffusion data obtained from Zagami, these authors argued that a 4 Ga-old Zagami, shock-heated to a temperature of $70°C (Fritz et al, 2005) at the time of Mars ejection $3 Ma ago, could not have lost most of its 40 Ar by diffusion without having resided in space as an impossibly large body. Thus, Zagami's Ar-Ar age must record a formation age much younger than 4 Ga. An Arrhenius plot of Ar diffusion data for NWA 1460 (Bogard, 2009) shows that Ar diffusion in this shergottite is similar to that in Zagami and several other shergottites.…”
Section: Validity Of the Ar-ar Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These estimates are based on the conversion of plagioclase to either a diaplectic 'maskelynite' ($14-45 GPa) or melt glass (>45 GPa) with a resulting increase in the refractive index and/or Raman band broadening, compared to unshocked plagioclase (Fritz et al, 2004). Specifically, for ALH4001, estimated values for peak shock pressure have evolved over time -$50-60 GPa (Langenhorst et al, 2000); <40 GPa (van der Bogert et al, 1999); $35-40 GPa (Stö ffler, 2000); 35.7 ± 4.5 GPa (Fritz et al, 2003); >35-40 GPa (Fritz et al, 2004) -with the best current estimate at 32 ± 1 GPa (Fritz et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from simulations of shockwave propagation through compositionally and texturally complex matrices are computationally difficult and sensitive to initial starting conditions, but do indicate that shock heating would have been highly heterogeneous at all size scales. Using a Hugoniot equation-ofstate experimentally derived from Stillwater pyroxenite, Twin Sister dunite (Stö ffler, 1982), and a gabbroic rock (Trunin et al, 2001), the post-shock temperature elevation for ALH84001 associated with a 32 GPa shock event lies in the range of $373-383 K (Fritz et al, 2005). If we assume ALH4001 prior to ejection was at the average Martian ground-surface temperature of $230 K and that the peak shock pressure experienced corresponded to this final ejection event (note, paleomagnetic data of Weiss et al (2000) suggest the interior of ALH84001 was not heated above $313 K), this would imply an average maximum heating, post-ejection, to a temperature of $610 K. This is in broad agreement with recent (U-Th)/He analyses of ALH84001 phosphate grains that suggest a peak ejection temperature of $673 K or less (Min and Reiners, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nakhlites are thought to be cumulates that formed subsurface (Reid and Bunch, 1975;Berkley et al, 1980;Harvey and McSween, 1992;McSween, 1994), and they appear to have cooled relatively slowly under oxidizing conditions Miyamoto, 1998, 2002). Nakhlites experienced lower shock levels than any other martian meteorites, and their plagioclases have not been converted to maskelynite (Fritz et al, 2005). A detailed review of nakhlites was presented by Treiman (2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%