2020
DOI: 10.20336/rbs.499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

El Diablo Negro: un nuevo pacto de energía en México

Abstract: La Reforma Energética aprobada al final de 2013 es parte de la política de posicionamiento global del Estado para atraer inversiones de capital nacional y extranjero, siendo, no sólo promotor, más también parcero. Esa acción determina la producción del territorio en diferentes escalas, aquí se muestran las escalas nacional, local y regional. La renta de la tierra se refiere, en este análisis a la producción de Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex), mismo antes de 2013, cuando la Constitución Mexicana fue alterada en sus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2013-2014 energy reform ended PEMEX's monopoly on hydrocarbon exploration, exploitation, and distribution. Although an in-depth explanation of why a farreaching energy reform passed in 2013 and details about its content are beyond the scope of this article because of space constraints (for details see Alpízar Castro and Rodríguez-Monroy, 2016;Cypher, 2018;Del Castillo-Musot et al, 2018;Luna Gómez, 2020;Rodríguez-Padilla, 2018;Rousseau, 2017;2020;Tetreault, 2019;and Vargas, 2015a), it is important to note that hints of the inherited oil nationalism continued to play a role, and PEMEX was protected from total privatization. PEMEX continues to exist and is still the largest company in the country, and constitutional limitations on private sector participation in numerous aspects of the hydrocarbons industry persist.…”
Section: Oil Nationalism During the Pan Administrations (2000-2012)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2013-2014 energy reform ended PEMEX's monopoly on hydrocarbon exploration, exploitation, and distribution. Although an in-depth explanation of why a farreaching energy reform passed in 2013 and details about its content are beyond the scope of this article because of space constraints (for details see Alpízar Castro and Rodríguez-Monroy, 2016;Cypher, 2018;Del Castillo-Musot et al, 2018;Luna Gómez, 2020;Rodríguez-Padilla, 2018;Rousseau, 2017;2020;Tetreault, 2019;and Vargas, 2015a), it is important to note that hints of the inherited oil nationalism continued to play a role, and PEMEX was protected from total privatization. PEMEX continues to exist and is still the largest company in the country, and constitutional limitations on private sector participation in numerous aspects of the hydrocarbons industry persist.…”
Section: Oil Nationalism During the Pan Administrations (2000-2012)mentioning
confidence: 99%