El dilema de la contribución voluntaria a bienes públicos: una revisión de trabajos experimentales.

García, Luis Alejandro Palacio; Parra, Daniel

doi:10.15446/cuad.econ.v33n62.43668

Cuad. econ.

2014

DOI: 10.15446/cuad.econ.v33n62.43668

|View full text |Cite

El dilema de la contribución voluntaria a bienes públicos: una revisión de trabajos experimentales.

Luis Alejandro Palacio García¹,

Daniel Parra²

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2015

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Social preferences are not enough: Accounting for anomalous behavior in a complex mixed-motive game

Moro¹,

Freidin²,

Tohmé³

2015

Cuad. Econ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In some economic games, participants systematically display behavior that departs from the model of payoff maximization, and this is usually attributed to social preferences. In this paper we focus on a new interactive context, a mixed-motive game called "Alternative Traveler's Dilemma" (ATD). In this context, most participants choose strictly dominated strategies. Preliminary studies suggest the reason for such a tendency is that participants have social preferences, usually competitive in nature. The question is whether some cognitive factors should also be included in models that account for the tendency at stake. More specifically, we investigate whether participants neglect payoff maximization, that is, whether they fail to notice that, by pursuing some competitive goal, they are not maximizing their payoffs. We report the results of an experiment that supports this hypothesis. We conclude that in order to explain anomalous behavior in the ATD, and similar games, we need to study the cognitive factors that bound participants' strategies and understanding of the game.

show abstract

Social preferences are not enough: Accounting for anomalous behavior in a complex mixed-motive game

Moro¹,

Freidin²,

Tohmé³

2015

Cuad. Econ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

El fundamento moral de los comportamientos urbanos responsables

Pinilla-López

2018

Rev. Colomb. Educ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Con base en el aporte de distintas disciplinas académicas que han abordado el tema de la moral como parte del resultado del proceso de la evolución humana, el presente artículo expone los argumentos por los cuales los comportamientos urbanos responsables (cur) se constituyen en actos morales. Considerar el hecho moral como el comportamiento en la búsqueda del bienestar común, y no solo del particular, es el punto de partida para analizar el origen y desarrollo de la moral humana. Los elementos conceptuales abordados en este trabajo exploran las diversas ideas que han buscado esclarecer el desarrollo humano de la moral, recorriendo la teoría de la evolución por selección natural, pasando por las destacadas y cuestionadas posturas de la sociobiología, y retomando aspectos de la filosofía moderna y crítica contemporánea, los estudios psicológicos sobre la elección racional humana, y el lenguaje y la norma como componentes clave del análisis sobre la moral. Con base en lo anterior, se analizan los cur como comportamientos morales al servicio de los consensuados intereses comunes de los diversos grupos humanos, resaltando su contribución a la sostenibilidad y a la convivencia en las ciudades.

show abstract

¡Tómelo o déjelo! Evidencia experimental sobre racionalidad, preferencias sociales y negociación

Palacio¹,

Parra²

2015

Lec Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

El dilema de la contribución voluntaria a bienes públicos: una revisión de trabajos experimentales.

Cited by 4 publications

References 40 publications

Social preferences are not enough: Accounting for anomalous behavior in a complex mixed-motive game

Social preferences are not enough: Accounting for anomalous behavior in a complex mixed-motive game

El fundamento moral de los comportamientos urbanos responsables

¡Tómelo o déjelo! Evidencia experimental sobre racionalidad, preferencias sociales y negociación

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About