In this work, two case studies were analyzed; Case 1 and Case 2, both located in Malinalco, State of Mexico, to maintain the interior temperature of the architectural spaces within the range of the thermal comfort zone for users (Auliciems and Szokolay). A diagnosis was made by measuring the interior temperature with a datalogger. The thermal behavior was analyzed through the elaboration of a three-dimensional computer model of the architectural envelope according to its current conditions, as well as the different alternatives of bioclimatic strategies, such as indirect, direct and internal gains, which are based on the correct selection of materials and their thermal properties. The three-dimensional computer model was analyzed through two tools, Design Builder 6.0 and Revit with its insight 360 add-on, with the objective of determining whether the latter is as effective as Design Builder 6.0. The Urban Development Program (PPDU) for Malinalco proposes a series of bioclimatic recommendations for the architectural envelope and the composition of its materials to maintain a comfortable temperature for the users, with the analysis of the three-dimensional model it was verified if these are efficient for the proposed case studies. The results of the experimental investigation revealed that in the architectural envelope for opaque surfaces when using a mixture of masonry and insulating materials according to their orientation, while for transparent surfaces when using a material with a low U-value, there is a significant improvement. The evaluation of a mixed system in terms of materials (masonry and insulation) revealed that there is a greater than 87% improvement for days in the thermal comfort zone. The Insight 360 tool was found to be ineffective because it does not account for operating temperature in the same manner as the Design Builder and relies primarily on the ASHRAE 90.1 standard. In addition, the PPDU does not meet the objective of maintaining the indoor temperature in the thermal comfort zone.