2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.10.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaborate ligand-based modeling and subsequent synthetic exploration unveil new nanomolar Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II inhibitory leads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting pharmacophores were validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, which evaluates the ability of tested pharmacophore to discriminate active compounds from a list composed of known 50 active ligands, i.e., against the targeted enzyme (i.e., PI3K-γ, Renin, or JAK1, IC 50 ≤ 1.0 μM), and a larger list of decoys (300–750 compounds, IC 50 range from 2 to 10 000 μM). The testing sets were assembled from CHEMBL database . Details of the ROC analysis are shown in Supporting Information Section SM-2. ,,, , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting pharmacophores were validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, which evaluates the ability of tested pharmacophore to discriminate active compounds from a list composed of known 50 active ligands, i.e., against the targeted enzyme (i.e., PI3K-γ, Renin, or JAK1, IC 50 ≤ 1.0 μM), and a larger list of decoys (300–750 compounds, IC 50 range from 2 to 10 000 μM). The testing sets were assembled from CHEMBL database . Details of the ROC analysis are shown in Supporting Information Section SM-2. ,,, , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pharmacophore is an abstract description of steric and electronic features necessary to be present in a particular ligand to allow optimal recognition and binding to a specific receptor and to trigger subsequent biological function. Pharmacophore models are derived either by structure-based or ligand-based approaches. In structure-based methodologies, pharmacophore models are extracted from crystallographic complexes involving high affinity ligands cocrystallized within targeted proteins . However, despite ligand–receptor binding involving numerous attractive interactions, only a few can be defined as pharmacophoric, i.e., critical for complex stability. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43] The most chemically similar compound is an inhibitor of CaMKIId that was discovered using pharmacophore search, which features as imilar quinazoline core as compound 1 (ECFP4 fingerprints, Ta nimoto coefficient of 0.154). [45] In their compound, the alkene linker of the benzene substituent is shortened with as econdary amine, and the alkylamine tail of 1 is replaced with am ethylpiperidine group. Additionally,w e compared the structure of 1 against~55 000 compounds in ChEMBL'sK inase SARfarid atabase.…”
Section: Virtual Screening Identifies Active Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual screening methodologies are broadly used nowadays to find novel specific kinase inhibitors. Specifically, ligand-based 3D pharmacophores were developed for CaMK-IIδ by Shahin and Taha in 2011 [ 29 ]. This study embraced the use of multiple linear regressions and genetic function algorithm in order to build a predictive quantitative structure–activity relationship equation that can describe the activity of potent CaMK-IIδ inhibitors [ 30 ].…”
Section: Camk-iiδmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, ligand-based 3D pharmacophores were developed for CaMK-IIδ by Shahin and Taha in 2011 [ 29 ]. This study embraced the use of multiple linear regressions and genetic function algorithm in order to build a predictive quantitative structure–activity relationship equation that can describe the activity of potent CaMK-IIδ inhibitors [ 30 ]. Finally, this approach resulted in several active inhibitors ranging in their activity from 0.02 to 2.46 µM (see compounds 11 and 12 , Table 1 ) [ 29 ].…”
Section: Camk-iiδmentioning
confidence: 99%