2008
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaboration of a quantitative job‐exposure matrix for historical exposure to airborne exposures in the Polish rubber industry

Abstract: This JEM provides an overview of historical exposure levels in a large Polish rubber factory and will enable estimation of lifetime exposure for individual workers in a Polish rubber workers cohort and further investigation of the associations between specific exposures and cancer risk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the usefulness of this method depends to a large extent on the availability of exposure measurement data. In generating the JEM for these analyses [33] enough data was available to estimate average exposure for the 51-58% of the person-years of employment. Nevertheless, assumptions had to be made for the time period outside the years covered by measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the usefulness of this method depends to a large extent on the availability of exposure measurement data. In generating the JEM for these analyses [33] enough data was available to estimate average exposure for the 51-58% of the person-years of employment. Nevertheless, assumptions had to be made for the time period outside the years covered by measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factory has produced tires for cars, trucks, lorries, trolleys, tractors, agricultural vehicles, motor-cycles, bicycles, as well as inner tubes and protectors. A more specific description of the factory and its history can be found in published literature [30,33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations