Elaboration of Active Knowledge Sharing Learning Model to Improve High Order Thinking Skills Integrated 4c

Asfar, Andi Muhammad Irfan Taufan; Ahmad, Muhammad Arifin; Anshari,; Asdar, Andi Muhammad Irfan Taufan

doi:10.24203/ajas.v9i4.6693

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The discussion: teams need to understand better the problem and the resources available to find solutions more effectively. Analytical skills can assist teams in resolving problems more effectively, creating a more harmonious environment that facilitates achieving the desired results(Asfar et al, 2021).The result: Participants ranked leadership as the third most influential factor that would lead to success. The discussion: It involves leading the team to achieve common goals, making decisions, and resolving conflicts.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Success in Interrelated Supply Chain: an Analysis of the Human Behaviour Under Crisis

Poshdar¹,

Herrera²,

González³

2023

Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC31)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A wealth of studies is available on the key success factors of managing interrelated projects in a construction supply chain. The human factor, however, is often overlooked in normative success solutions. According to classical management theory, individuals are expected to act rationally and maximise their utility. Although, due to an individual's computational and cognitive abilities, decision-makers often choose the first satisfactory course of action rather than searching for the optimal course of action, particularly during times of crisis. This study adopted a surrogate model to conduct a series of laboratory simulations that involved human behaviour. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to determine the experiment design, followed by sixteen hours of experiments that spanned two countries investigating decision-making behaviour within two prominent management models: the traditional and collaborative models. In order to identify patterns in the perception of the participants regarding real success factors, a content analysis was performed on their questionnaire responses. This analysis identified three key characteristics of construction success and the top characteristics required to succeed under each model investigated. By sharing these insights and lessons learned, teams can gain a deeper understanding of what it takes to succeed in a competitive environment.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Success in Interrelated Supply Chain: an Analysis of the Human Behaviour Under Crisis

Poshdar¹,

Herrera²,

González³

2023

Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC31)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition to providing scaffolding, several things need to be considered in improving students' critical thinking skills. Providing HOTs-level problems contributes to improving students' critical thinking skills (Asfar et al, 2021). Selection of a suitable learning model also needs to be considered to improve students' critical thinking skills, such as problem-based learning, discovery, and problem posing models (Martaida et al, 2017;Sapta et al, 2019;Khotimah et al, 2021).…”

Section: Explanation Failure In Subjectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scaffolding to Help Middle School Students' Critical Thinking Skill in Solving Social Arithmetic Material

Tazkia,

Siswono

2023

J. Math. Pedagogy (JoMP)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Junior high school students in completing social arithmetic material often fail to think critically, so they need help using scaffolding to help critical thinking skill. This qualitative research is a case study of two junior high school students who failed to think critically. Data were obtained through task-based interviews. The tests used in this study were 2 social arithmetic questions that required students' critical thinking skills in solving them. Data analysis used the flow model analysis technique developed by Miles and Huberman (2014) which consisted of data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The researcher uses research diligence to ensure the credibility of the data. The results of this study indicate that Subject 1's critical thinking failure lies in the components of interpretation, and inference. Subject 2 failed to think critically on the components of interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation. The scaffolding given to overcome the failure of critical thinking in subject 1 and subject 2 is the Anghileri’s level 2 scaffolding, namely explaining, reviewing, and restructuring.

show abstract

“…Communication requires interaction between humans to build a process of exchanging messages of information and knowledge with other people (Amin, 2023;Halimah & Sukmayadi, 2019). Effective communication can facilitate achieving the desired target results (Asfar et al, 2021;Alawamleh et al, 2022). Effective communication can assist students to satisfy learning objectives and do better academically during the classroom learning process.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influence of WE-ARe (Warm-Up, Exploring, Argumentation, Resume) Model Integrated with 21st-Century Skills on Prospective Biology Teachers' Communication Skills

Amin,

Adiansyah,

Mustami

et al. 2024

JPII

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research aims to identify the influence of the WE-ARe (Warm-up, Exploring, Argumentation, Resume) model integrated with 21st-century skills on prospective biology teachers’ communication skills. The research type was quantitative, using a quasi-experiment research design. The research sample consisted of 60 biology education students in three classes. The research instruments used were valid and reliable observation sheets and questionnaires to measure communication skills. Data were analyzed using Covariate Analysis (ANCOVA) with a significant level of 5%. The research shows that the average communication in the experimental group after receiving treatment is 90.63, while in the positive control group, it is 73.54, and in the negative control group, it is 39.14. The test results to find out the difference in communication skills between the experimental and control groups obtained a calculated F value of 2846.491 with a significance value of 0.000. The significance value is smaller than the real level alpha 5% or (0.05). The research concludes that there is an influence of the WE-ARe model integrated with 21st-century skills on prospective biology teachers’ communication skills. The learning phases of the WE-ARe model integrated with 21st-century skills are proven to improve verbal and non-verbal communication skills. WE-ARe is a new learning model developed by researchers to accommodate the learning needs of students in the Industry 4.0 era towards the Society 5.0 era by using the principles of constructivism, collaborative, and participatory elaboration. The research is expected to contribute to increasing the global competence of university graduates, especially teachers.

show abstract

Elaboration of Active Knowledge Sharing Learning Model to Improve High Order Thinking Skills Integrated 4c

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Success in Interrelated Supply Chain: an Analysis of the Human Behaviour Under Crisis

Success in Interrelated Supply Chain: an Analysis of the Human Behaviour Under Crisis

Scaffolding to Help Middle School Students' Critical Thinking Skill in Solving Social Arithmetic Material

The Influence of WE-ARe (Warm-Up, Exploring, Argumentation, Resume) Model Integrated with 21st-Century Skills on Prospective Biology Teachers' Communication Skills

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About