1992
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.45.3694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic electron backscattering from surfaces with overlayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EPES has also been used for: studies of systems consisting of an overlayer deposited on a substrate; 6,7 hydrogen detection on the surface; 8 surface composition of alloys; 9 examining growth modes of ultrathin gold films deposited on nickel 10 or on Al and alumina; 11 and the studies of surfaces with overlayers. 12,13 It has been shown that there is good accordance between experimentally obtained parameters describing elastic backscattering and theoretical predictions. 11 -23 However, few MC simulations have been applied for evaluating the elastic reflection intensity for a complex sample.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…EPES has also been used for: studies of systems consisting of an overlayer deposited on a substrate; 6,7 hydrogen detection on the surface; 8 surface composition of alloys; 9 examining growth modes of ultrathin gold films deposited on nickel 10 or on Al and alumina; 11 and the studies of surfaces with overlayers. 12,13 It has been shown that there is good accordance between experimentally obtained parameters describing elastic backscattering and theoretical predictions. 11 -23 However, few MC simulations have been applied for evaluating the elastic reflection intensity for a complex sample.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In this report the Monte Carlo method was used to evaluate the photoelectron yields in a narrow and the 2π solid angles for Al, Cu, Ag, W and Pt targets and Ti 2s, Mn 2p3/ 2 , Al 2p, Au 4f7/ 2 photoelectron lines corresponding to the electron initial energies of 689, 613, 1169 and 1180 eV respectively. Detailed description of the Monte Carlo procedure may be found elsewhere [9]. In Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Analytical and Monte Carlo Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the constant-Ó energy approximation was used : the cross-sections for elastic and inelastic scattering were calculated for the initial energy only ; they were not updated during the slowing down of the electrons. The inelastic mean free path, ji, for 1000 eV electrons in Ag is 14 …”
Section: Model Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%