2013
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2012.2218936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic Element Integration for Improved Flapping-Wing Micro Air Vehicle Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research showed that clicking compliant mechanisms could produce more thrust per input power than a conventional rigid-body counterpart. Finally, Sahai et al [17] demonstrated that flapping transmission with rubber flexural hinges can reduce input power up to 20%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research showed that clicking compliant mechanisms could produce more thrust per input power than a conventional rigid-body counterpart. Finally, Sahai et al [17] demonstrated that flapping transmission with rubber flexural hinges can reduce input power up to 20%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were sufficiently precise and repeatable to enable the 80 mg robot to demonstrate an unconstrained flight [105]. A similar procedure was also used to construct slightly larger wings from 400 µm thick titanium shim and 1.5 µm Mylar film for a 3 g MAV [116,117]. To summarize the methods and materials used for fabrication of artificial wings over different scales, we tabulate an extensive list of fabricated artificial wings together with the corresponding fabrication methods and materials in table 2.…”
Section: (B) Wing Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, for CTM II, the input torque relative to the pure RMB, is reduced by 40.4% and 73.9%, for maximum and minimum input torques, respectively. In addition, it can also be found that the peak torque optimized of the compliant mechanism obtained by using the limitations Case I is smaller that the corresponding gotten by utilizing the constraints Case II, which shows that the constraint method provided in this paper is better than that used in (13). In fact, the constraint conditions Case II is only a specific subset of the limitations Case I.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Similarly, Sahai et al (13,14) attempted to integrate flexural hinges into a four-bar compliant flapping transmission for a FWMAV with approximately 3 grams of weight. A distinguishing feature of the mechanism is using rubber-based flexures in two of its joints (joints 3 and 4, see The prototype of the Harvard University's FWMAV and its the four-bar transmission mechanism.…”
Section: Motor-based Compliant Transmission Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation