1983
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(83)90645-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic neutron-deuteron scattering in the energy range from 2.5 MeV to 30 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The total angular momentum for the NN interaction used in the calculations was j ~< 3. At 8.0 MeV the data of Schwartz et al [8], Janson et al [9] and Seagrave et al [10] are in excellent agreement. The agreement between the data at 10.0 MeV is good but not quite as good as at 8.0 MeV.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total angular momentum for the NN interaction used in the calculations was j ~< 3. At 8.0 MeV the data of Schwartz et al [8], Janson et al [9] and Seagrave et al [10] are in excellent agreement. The agreement between the data at 10.0 MeV is good but not quite as good as at 8.0 MeV.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…The agreement between the data at 10.0 MeV is good but not quite as good as at 8.0 MeV. Since the data of Schwartz et al [8] were measured at 10.25 MeV, they should be about 27o lower, according to 3N calculations, than the 10.0 MeV data of Amten et al [11]; implying that either the data of Schwartz et al [8] are systematically slightly high or the data of Amten et al [11] are low. The discrepancy between the data becomes more obvious at 14 MeV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…5 and compared with data from Schwarz et al [38]. The solid green line is the LO prediction, the dashed blue line the NLO prediction, and the red band the N 2 LO prediction with a 6% error estimate from the EFT π power counting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Former investigations of the elastic p-d scattering did not emphasize the very small forward and extreme backward angles sensitive to the Coulomb interaction [10,11,12]. The recent improved n-d results of the cross section and the analyzing power [4,13,14,15] prompt a comparison to new and improved p-d data. In particular the extreme backward angles cross sections of p-d scattering as compared to n-d scattering should be useful in checking the validity of any theoretical method of introducing Coulomb corrections into Faddeev calculations [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%