Elastic scattering of charged mesons, antiprotons and protons on protons at incident momenta of 20, 30 and 50 GeV/c in the momentum transfer range 0.5 &lt; −t &lt; 8 (GeV/c)2

Asa'd, Z.; Baglin, C.; Böck, Rudolf; Bugge, L.; Buran, T.; Buzzo, A.; Coupland, M.; Davis, D.G.; Duff, B.G.; Fearnley, T.; Ferroni, S.; Gjerpe, I.; Guillaud, J.P.; Gracco, V.; Heymann, F.F.; Imrie, D. C.; Kirsebom, K.; Lundby, A.; Lush, G.J.; Macrı́, M.; Myrheim, Jan; Phillips, Mark H.; Poulet, M.; Santroni, A.; Skjevling, G.; Sørsdal, T.

doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90137-3

Cited by 21 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Agreement with experiment [5,10,[86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94]98,99] [103], we conjecture that saddle point interpolation between the endpoint model and the S D model will be the dominant asymptotic amplitude. This is because the Sudakov suppression of one fast quark is less severe than the three fast quarks of the I S model.…”

Section: General Featuressupporting

confidence: 55%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Uncovering the scaling laws of hard exclusive hadronic processes in a comprehensive endpoint model

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We show that an endpoint-overlap model can explain the scaling laws observed in exclusive hadronic reactions at large momentum transfer. The model assumes one of the valence quarks carries most of the hadron momentum. Hadron form factors and fixed-angle scattering are related directly to the quark wave function, which can be directly extracted from experimental data. A universal linear endpoint behavior explains the proton electromagnetic form factor, proton-proton fixed-angle scattering, and the t-dependence of proton-proton scattering at large s >> t. Endpoint constituent counting rules relate the number of quarks in a hadron to the power-law behavior. All proton reactions surveyed are consistent with three quarks participating. The model is applicable at laboratory energies and does not need assumptions of asymptotically high energy regime. A rich phenomenology of lepton-hadron scattering and hadron-hadron scattering processes is found in remarkably simple relationships between diverse processes. Experimental regularitiesThe experimental study of differential cross sections of hard exclusive hadronic reactions at high energy reveals a remarkable pattern: They are described by power laws [1][2][3]. A model explanation exists [4][5][6][7], yet it is not satisfactory [8] at the energies of experimental measurements. We are driven to find a consistent explanation of experimental regularities by re-examining all the facts from a fresh point of view."Hard" reactions are those which depend on a single large scale Q 2 > GeV 2 , or several large scales with a fixed ratio. It is remarkable that the proton electromagnetic form factor a e-mail: sumeetkd@iitk.ac.in b e-mail: pkjain@iitk.ac.in c e-mail: ralston@ku.edu F 1 (Q 2 ) agrees well with a decreasing power of Q 2 for Q 2 5 GeV 2 [9]. For large momentum transfer, it is remarkable that pp → pp fixed-angle cross section dσ/dt agrees well with a decreasing power of Q 2 ∼ s [10], where √ s is the center of mass energy. There are many other examples.We have re-evaluated the phenomenology of power-law dependence or "scaling laws" for exclusive reactions. Due to history, the most simple and plausible explanation failed to be developed. The model appears in the literature as the Feynman process, also known as the Drell-Yan model, also known as the endpoint-overlap model [11][12][13]. There is much to be learned and much that is new when the model is objectively explored. The endpoint-overlap modelBefore engaging the technical analysis, a brief synopsis of history is appropriate. It is fair to observe that relatively few papers in recent years have supported the short-distance model that dominated attention earlier. How and why did consideration of soft processes in hard scattering take so long to develop? In their evaluation of the endpoint region, Brodsky and Mueller [14] wrote that "its contribution depends sensitively on the hadronic wave functions". The discussion discovered no actual fault in the endpoint contribution. Instead of finding a flaw, the section end...

show abstract

Section: General Featuressupporting

confidence: 55%

“…In this section we find that the experimentally observed power laws of hadron-hadron exclusive reactions [5,10,[80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95] are explained by the endpoint-overlap model. Unlike the S D model, no approximations of an asymptotic character are needed.…”

Section: Hadron-hadron Exclusive Reactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Uncovering the scaling laws of hard exclusive hadronic processes in a comprehensive endpoint model

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…where the free parameters µ, B 0 has been adjusted to the πN elastic scattering data, as illustrated in Fig. √ s ≃ 9.7 GeV) [38][39][40] and [38,41,42]. The black dashed lines show results with formula (2.10) while the red solid lines are obtained via the replacement (2.11), where B 0 = 6.5 GeV −2 and µ 2 = 0.6 GeV 2 .…”

Section: Born Amplitudementioning

confidence: 99%

“…FIG.3: Differential distributions dσ/dt for π + p (left panel) and π − p (right panel) elastic scattering at incident beam momenta P lab = 50 GeV ( √ s ≃ 9.7 GeV)[38][39][40] andP lab = 200 GeV ( √ s ≃ 19.4 GeV)[38,41,42]. The black dashed lines show results with formula (2.10) while the red solid lines are obtained via the replacement(2.11), where B 0 = 6.5 GeV −2 and µ 2 = 0.6 GeV 2 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Revised model of absorption corrections for thepp→ppπ+π−process

Lebiedowicz

Szczurek

2015

Phys. Rev. D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We include new additional absorption corrections into the Lebiedowicz-Szczurek (nonresonant) model for pp → ppπ + π − or pp → ppπ + π − processes. They are related to the πN nonperturbative interaction in the final state of the reaction. The role of the absorption corrections is quantified for several differential distributions for √ s = 0.2, 1.96, 7, and 8 TeV. The new absorption corrections lead to further decrease of the cross section by about a factor of two. They change the shape of some distributions (dσ/dt, dσ/dp t,p , dσ/dφ pp ) but leave almost unchanged shape of other distributions (dσ/dM ππ , dσ/dy π , dσ/dp t,π , dσ/dφ ππ ). The effect may have important impact on the interpretation of the recent STAR and CDF data as well as the forthcoming data of the ALICE, ATLAS + ALFA and CMS + TOTEM collaborations.

show abstract

“…The diffraction cone behavior changed at larger transferred momenta |t| to a slower t-dependence. Somewhat later, the energy range was extended to 50 GeV [10,11,12]. With the advent of new accelerators, the data for pp scattering at energies √ s ≈ 19, 20, 23, 28, 31, 45, 53, 62 GeV were published [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28] and the data for pp at 31,53,62,546,630,1800,1980 GeV [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38] appeared.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Elastic scattering of hadrons

Dremin¹

2013

Phys. Usp.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Elastic scattering of charged mesons, antiprotons and protons on protons at incident momenta of 20, 30 and 50 GeV/c in the momentum transfer range 0.5 < −t < 8 (GeV/c)2

Cited by 21 publications

References 55 publications

Uncovering the scaling laws of hard exclusive hadronic processes in a comprehensive endpoint model

Uncovering the scaling laws of hard exclusive hadronic processes in a comprehensive endpoint model

Revised model of absorption corrections for thepp→ppπ+π−process

Elastic scattering of hadrons

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About