1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf02607685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastizitätsmodul und Zugfestigkeit von Holz verschiedener Rohdichte in Abhängigkeit vom Feuchtigkeitsgehalt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
4

Year Published

1985
1985
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The ultimate Te stress σ UTS , on the other hand, is reached at ω = 5.9 % , ω = 3.3 % , and ω = 4.7 % in the L, R, and T directions, respectively, indicating a strength decline at lower MCs ( Figure 6 ). Similar findings showing that drying below a certain point leads to reduced strengths were reported (Goulet 1960 ;Kufner 1978 ;Kretschmann and Green 1996 ). Based on the mentioned references, the optimum σ UTS is reached at MCs ω ≈ 4 -12 % depending on the wood species and the orthotropic direction.…”
Section: Strength Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ultimate Te stress σ UTS , on the other hand, is reached at ω = 5.9 % , ω = 3.3 % , and ω = 4.7 % in the L, R, and T directions, respectively, indicating a strength decline at lower MCs ( Figure 6 ). Similar findings showing that drying below a certain point leads to reduced strengths were reported (Goulet 1960 ;Kufner 1978 ;Kretschmann and Green 1996 ). Based on the mentioned references, the optimum σ UTS is reached at MCs ω ≈ 4 -12 % depending on the wood species and the orthotropic direction.…”
Section: Strength Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Interestingly, the influence of MC on the strength properties of wood was recognized early (Tiemann 1906 ), but a complete data set covering the strength values in Te and Co as a function of MC in all anatomical directions is not available. Yet, especially in the R and T directions, where wood strength is of great importance with regard to the load capacity and failure prediction of wooden structures, the knowledge about the moisture-dependent behavior in these directions is limited to a few references (Kollmann 1956 ;Goulet 1960 ;Kufner 1978 ;Hering et al 2012b ;Ozyhar et al 2012b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous investigations tension wood was also proven to have a higher gross density than normal wood. In poplar, with a normal gross density r l of 0.43 g/cm³ (Kufner 1978), an increase of 12 to 17% for tension wood was observed frequently (for review see Sachsse 1965). The reduction of vessel frequency, leading to higher fibre density, as well as the additional, thick G-layer is assumed to cause this increase.…”
Section: Gross Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, moisture-dependent wood strength, above all the tensile strength in the R and T directions, remain widely unknown for most wood species. The available data are limited to a few references [4,[8][9][10]. Since tensile stress perpendicular to the grain represents the weakest timber point [11][12][13], its knowledge, especially with regard to the load capacity and failure prediction of wooden structures, is of great importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%