2015
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastography Assessment of Liver Fibrosis: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Statement

Abstract: The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a panel of specialists from radiology, hepatology, pathology, and basic science and physics to arrive at a consensus regarding the use of elastography in the assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease. The panel met in Denver, Colo, on October 21-22, 2014, and drafted this consensus statement. The recommendations in this statement are based on analysis of current literature and common practice strategies and are thought to represent a reasonable app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
627
1
11

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 551 publications
(657 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
18
627
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean, median, and average velocities are calculated automatically. Barr et al (48) recommended using the median velocity for interpretation (Fig 5).…”
Section: One-dimensional Transient Elastography-mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mean, median, and average velocities are calculated automatically. Barr et al (48) recommended using the median velocity for interpretation (Fig 5).…”
Section: One-dimensional Transient Elastography-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed previously, a depth of 2-7 cm from the liver capsule is ideal. The acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) push pulse is attenuated as it traverses the patient and reaches a point at which adequate shear waves are not generated for accurate measurement; this problem results in false low-velocity measurements from deeper tissues (48). The degree of attenuation depends on the amplitude of the ARFI pulse (which is restricted by U.S. Food and Drug Administration limits); low-amplitude pulses are attenuated at more superficial depths.…”
Section: Us Elastographic Confoundersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unsuccessful measurement was excluded from further analysis. 22,23 The main portal vein velocity (PVV) and splenic vein velocity (SVV) were measured at the hepatic hilus ( Figure 2) and splenic hilus (Figure 3), respectively. Doppler settings, including Doppler angle correction (the sound beam should be as parallel to the flow direction as possible, at least <60°), sample gate (3 mm), pulse repetition frequency, scale, and Doppler gain, were adjusted according to the depth of the portal and splenic veins and venous flow status.…”
Section: Elastography and Splenoportal Vein Doppler Sonographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we obtained 9 splenic SWV measurements in our study, whereas 10 SWV measurements in the liver are currently recommended. 22 The recommended protocol of 10 SWV measurements for assessing tissue stiffness is taken into consideration for standardization of abdominal organ (eg, spleen) stiffness assessments in future studies. Finally, we are not able to test whether the same splenic SWV could be measured by using ultrasound scanners designed by different manufactures.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[3][4][5] HF is the hallmark of CLD. 2,[6][7][8] Monitoring for the presence of HF and staging (quantifying) the severity and progression over time are essential for the diagnosis and therapeutic management of CLD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%