2018
DOI: 10.18778/8088-999-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastyczność zachowań organizacyjnych pracowników. Koncepcja i metodyka badań

Abstract: Tomkowi, Amelce i Kubusiowi Dziękuję, że zawsze, na zawsze… jesteście ze mną Spis treści WstępRozdział 1 Zachowania ludzi w organizacji -założenia ontologiczne1.1. Geneza badań nad zachowaniami ludzi w organizacji 1.2. Zakres przedmiotowy i podmiotowy zachowań organizacyjnych 1.3. Zachowania organizacyjne w naukach o zarządzaniu 1.4. Rodzaje zachowań organizacyjnych Rozdział 2 Pojęcie elastyczności na gruncie nauk o zarządzaniu 2.1. Istota i znaczenie elastyczności 2.2. Wybrane kategorie opisu elastyczności w … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although intra-organizational mobility has interested management theorists and practitioners for many years (March & Simon, 1958;Webster & Beehr, 2013;Jackofsky & Peters, 1983;Forbes, 1987), it is still poorly and imprecisely defined. It is worth highlighting that when interpreting the concept of "employee mobility," some authors use synonymous terms such as turnover (Dalton & Todor, 1987, Jackofsky, 1984, flexibility (Januszkiewicz, 2018), job mobility (Kalleberg & Mastekaasa, 2001) or intra-organizational mobility (Webster & Beehr, 2013). In the literature addressing the problem of employee mobility within an organization, there is often disagreement about the core of the definitional term.…”
Section: Intra-organizational Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although intra-organizational mobility has interested management theorists and practitioners for many years (March & Simon, 1958;Webster & Beehr, 2013;Jackofsky & Peters, 1983;Forbes, 1987), it is still poorly and imprecisely defined. It is worth highlighting that when interpreting the concept of "employee mobility," some authors use synonymous terms such as turnover (Dalton & Todor, 1987, Jackofsky, 1984, flexibility (Januszkiewicz, 2018), job mobility (Kalleberg & Mastekaasa, 2001) or intra-organizational mobility (Webster & Beehr, 2013). In the literature addressing the problem of employee mobility within an organization, there is often disagreement about the core of the definitional term.…”
Section: Intra-organizational Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flexibility of the organisational behaviour of employees should be understood in this approach as a manifested change in behaviour that fosters either a development, or maintains the position of, an employee with regard to his/her potential and the potential of the organisation in which he/she is employed. The frequency of change determines the level of flexibility, while its scope determines the type of flexibility of organisational behaviour of employees (Januszkiewicz, 2018). Such a conceptual framework for flexibility was the basis for identifying the indicators of flexible behaviour described in the literature and assigning them to individual dimensions (Table 1).…”
Section: Indicators Of Fobementioning
confidence: 99%