2011
DOI: 10.1257/aer.101.4.1274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electoral Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from the Audits of Local Governments

Abstract: We show that political institutions affect corruption levels. We use audit reports in Brazil to construct new measures of political corruption in local governments and test whether electoral accountability affects the corruption practices of incumbent politicians. We find significantly less corruption in municipalities where mayors can get reelected. Mayors with reelection incentives misappropriate 27 percent fewer resources than mayors without reelection incentives. These effects are more pronounced among mun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
207
2
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 676 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
207
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This is clearly an interesting road for future research which goes beyond the aim of our paper though (see e.g. Ferraz and Finan (2011), Gagliarducci and Nannicini (2012), Pettersson-Lidbom (2003) for first empirical steps in this direction). 4…”
Section: Theory and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 87%
“…This is clearly an interesting road for future research which goes beyond the aim of our paper though (see e.g. Ferraz and Finan (2011), Gagliarducci and Nannicini (2012), Pettersson-Lidbom (2003) for first empirical steps in this direction). 4…”
Section: Theory and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 87%
“…A prominent recent example is Ferraz and Finan (2011) showing that Brazilian mayors who can be reelected are less corrupt.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work is particularly related to the recent strand of this literature, which provides empirical estimates of social costs of political connections and shows that political connections, in part, determine the allocation of government procurement contracts, (e.g., Cingano and Pinotti 2013;Amore and Bennedsen 2013;Goldman, Rocholl, and So 2013). 1 We also contribute to the empirical literature that attempts to provide systematic evidence of corruption using objective rather than perception-based measures (e.g., Di Tella and Schargrodsky 2003;Reinikka and Svensson 2004;Bertrand et al 2007a;Olken 2007;Fisman and Miguel 2007;Butler, Fauver, and Mortal 2009;Caselli and Michaels 2009;Cheung, Rau, and Stouraitis 2011;Ferraz and Finan 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%