1972
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4073(72)90077-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric quadrupole transitions in Fe XVI, Co XVII and Ni XVIII

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
33
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
9
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The S-values for the np 2 P o − n f 2 F o transitions with n = 3-6 and n = 4-7 are also collected in Table 3. Again, a general good accord between the set of RQDO f -values and those reported by Tull et al (1972) is found, the discrepancies being less than 6%, with the only exception of the 3p 2 P o − 6f 2 F o and 3p 2 P o − 7f 2 F o multiplets, where they amount to about 17% and 36%, respectively, and both of these correspond to very small values. The RQDO results for the nd 2 D -n d 2 D transitions with n = 3-6 and n = 4-7 have a relative deviation with respect to the HF results (Tull et al 1972) of less than 5%.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The S-values for the np 2 P o − n f 2 F o transitions with n = 3-6 and n = 4-7 are also collected in Table 3. Again, a general good accord between the set of RQDO f -values and those reported by Tull et al (1972) is found, the discrepancies being less than 6%, with the only exception of the 3p 2 P o − 6f 2 F o and 3p 2 P o − 7f 2 F o multiplets, where they amount to about 17% and 36%, respectively, and both of these correspond to very small values. The RQDO results for the nd 2 D -n d 2 D transitions with n = 3-6 and n = 4-7 have a relative deviation with respect to the HF results (Tull et al 1972) of less than 5%.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…1, where the multiplet line strengths obtained in the present calculations are compared with the theoretical results reported by Tull et al (1972). The RQDO/HF S-values ratios are plotted on a logarithmic scale versus log S RQDO .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations