2019
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric resistance tomography and stress wave tomography for decay detection in trees—a comparison study

Abstract: Background To ensure the safety of trees, two NDT (nondestructive testing) techniques, electric resistance tomography and stress wave tomography, were employed to quantitatively detect and characterize the internal decay of standing trees. Comparisons between those two techniques were done to make full use of the individual capability for decay detection. Methods Eighty trees (40 Manchurian ash and 40 Populus simonii) were detected, then wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly used nondestructive testing methods [2] for detecting the internal damage of timber components mainly include stress wave [3][4][5], X-ray scanning [6][7][8], drilling resistance [9][10][11], and ultrasonic wave [12][13][14]. However, it is difficult to achieve precise detection by using only one single detection method because each of these methods has its own advantages and disadvantages [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Commonly used nondestructive testing methods [2] for detecting the internal damage of timber components mainly include stress wave [3][4][5], X-ray scanning [6][7][8], drilling resistance [9][10][11], and ultrasonic wave [12][13][14]. However, it is difficult to achieve precise detection by using only one single detection method because each of these methods has its own advantages and disadvantages [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many methods provide nondestructive assessment of the internal damage of old wood in timber structures, no single method can provide a complete data set for analysis [11]. In recent years, many scholars have used a combination of detection methods to detect internal damage of wood components [8,15,20,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. However, currently, there are not many methods to quantify uniformly the detection results detected by different methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease in strength classes could be determined by an increase in the share of defects in terms of their surface area. It is an indicator that also translates into their distribution on a cross-section, which has been previously confirmed by numerous studies using innovative techniques, such as computed tomography [ 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…PiCUS TreeTronic 3 electrical resistance tomography (Argus GmbH, Germany) were used to measure ER, (Balá et al 2020; Benson et al 2018;Yue et al 2019). Stress wave tomography (SWT) (RINNTECH GmbH, Germany) was used to measure SWV in trunks (Benson et al 2018;Liang et al 2008).…”
Section: Test Equipmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%